Search Results
7/9/2025, 7:10:34 PM
>men should only obsess over sports ball and cars so they have time for 90 hour work weeks so their wives can sit at home watching bridgerton and tiktok all day
why does the thought of men having and ounce of free time and some personal money piss conservatards off so hard? at least feminists dont think men should be slave laborers
why does the thought of men having and ounce of free time and some personal money piss conservatards off so hard? at least feminists dont think men should be slave laborers
7/4/2025, 11:31:47 PM
>>17813529
You're such a fucking retard.
Göbbels was the one who supported Hitler staying in Berlin to the end.
The children were flown in after Hitler refused to leave.
You're literally making shit up, hoping people will believe your bullshit. Why? What's the point convincing anons of something that isnt true?
Also why are you quoting things I never even said? It's fucking weird. What kind of anon writes his own text and then puts it as a quote?
Finally, if Göbbels wanted to save his children he wouldnt have brought them to Berlin mere hours before it got cut off. He would have sent them anywhere else.
This is the biggest stormfaggot cope of the entire ww2 debate that just gets ridiculously absurd because they themselves cant see how irrational they are.
You're such a fucking retard.
Göbbels was the one who supported Hitler staying in Berlin to the end.
The children were flown in after Hitler refused to leave.
You're literally making shit up, hoping people will believe your bullshit. Why? What's the point convincing anons of something that isnt true?
Also why are you quoting things I never even said? It's fucking weird. What kind of anon writes his own text and then puts it as a quote?
Finally, if Göbbels wanted to save his children he wouldnt have brought them to Berlin mere hours before it got cut off. He would have sent them anywhere else.
This is the biggest stormfaggot cope of the entire ww2 debate that just gets ridiculously absurd because they themselves cant see how irrational they are.
6/30/2025, 8:57:29 AM
>da jooz just banned muh drawn cp and that's bad because uhhhhh it just is
6/26/2025, 1:23:27 PM
>>17791935
Yep, Hitler enabled it. logically speaking.
Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, the war, and Operation Barbarossa, are the three key conditions which allowed the USSR to spread.
Remove these events, and you've removed the conditions
MRP allowed it to spread across 1/4 of the continent
Babrarossa allowed it to spread to Germany, to Hungary, to Czechia
The war allowed it to happen without opposition from a united continent
The only argument against this would be if Stalin actually planned an offensive war irregardless of Hitler. An offensive war into the nordic, into Germany, into the Balkans
Which he wasnt planning, not just because there exists not a single military document to support a war of that scale, but also because it was one of the main feuds between him and Trotsky. Stalin argued for "Socialism in one country" policy that was based on isolationism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism_in_one_country
It's also theoretically impossible, because an offensive on that scale would have met against a unified continent if it occured during peacetime, and the Soviets would likely have been embargo'ed by the remaining world. Stalin was cautious of angering the western powers which is believed to be his reason for delaying the invasion of Poland for so long; he wanted Germany to catch all the heat from the outside world, before taking his share of Poland
It is also practically impossible because in this scenario, the Red Army is still untested from the purges in 1930s, and instead of realising their inability against a ragtag handful of poorly equipt infantry divisions in isolated Finland (as happened IRL), the Soviets would instead find out about their inefficiency against a modern military with combined arms and prepared defences, and unlike Finland, the Soviets would have no rest-time after to correct their mistakes because they would immediately be at war with the continent, including Britain and France. They would also recieve no aid from Britain or USA.
Yep, Hitler enabled it. logically speaking.
Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, the war, and Operation Barbarossa, are the three key conditions which allowed the USSR to spread.
Remove these events, and you've removed the conditions
MRP allowed it to spread across 1/4 of the continent
Babrarossa allowed it to spread to Germany, to Hungary, to Czechia
The war allowed it to happen without opposition from a united continent
The only argument against this would be if Stalin actually planned an offensive war irregardless of Hitler. An offensive war into the nordic, into Germany, into the Balkans
Which he wasnt planning, not just because there exists not a single military document to support a war of that scale, but also because it was one of the main feuds between him and Trotsky. Stalin argued for "Socialism in one country" policy that was based on isolationism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism_in_one_country
It's also theoretically impossible, because an offensive on that scale would have met against a unified continent if it occured during peacetime, and the Soviets would likely have been embargo'ed by the remaining world. Stalin was cautious of angering the western powers which is believed to be his reason for delaying the invasion of Poland for so long; he wanted Germany to catch all the heat from the outside world, before taking his share of Poland
It is also practically impossible because in this scenario, the Red Army is still untested from the purges in 1930s, and instead of realising their inability against a ragtag handful of poorly equipt infantry divisions in isolated Finland (as happened IRL), the Soviets would instead find out about their inefficiency against a modern military with combined arms and prepared defences, and unlike Finland, the Soviets would have no rest-time after to correct their mistakes because they would immediately be at war with the continent, including Britain and France. They would also recieve no aid from Britain or USA.
6/23/2025, 9:20:31 PM
>>17785261
>If the allies COULD have launched Overlord sooner, well, why didnt they?
Same reason Germany didnt
>The Germans delayed Barbarossa due to personal decisions.
lol ok, then Overlord was delayed due to personal decisions
>Overlord occurred when it did because the British and Americans literally did not have the capability to launch it until mid 1944
Sounds like cope.
So Germany can do everything earlier but not the allies? hmmm
>>17785258
>everyone had rockets
The allies were ahead of Germany. Robert Goddard developed rockets before ww2.
So allies might as well have rockets in 1939 because why not? Germany gets everything early for no reason.
>How would they get it earlier?
How would Germany get anything earlier?
>We know how Germany would the get assault rifle earlier,
We actually dont.
>tell Hitler to go pound sand and give the experts the autonomy to do what they actually wanted to do.
Ok so tell Churchill to mind off from Tube Alloys program and Britain gets nukes in 1941. Easy.
>Pershing sucked
They were quite good actually and would have busted most of the Panzer 4s that were the backbone of German armour.
>no one delayed the IS
No but Soviets can have them earlier because why not? Germany gets their tech earlier.
>Comet sucked
Tank designs post-ww2 were based on Comet rather than Tigers. Cope
>no one delayed the AK
No but the Soviets can have them earlier because why not?
>no one delayed their development and they arent meaningfully better than the other heavy bombers at the time.
Dropping 4 nukes on Germany in a single run is pretty kino tho?
>>17785255
>Germany could end the war prior to 1947
Only if they surrender.
>nukes arent the superweapon you think they are.
Did I just fucking read this right?
>a unified continental Europe is food independent
Is that why Germany starved millions of people in east through the Hunger Plan despite having virtually the entire continent under occupation?
Or did the Germans do it just for fun?
>If the allies COULD have launched Overlord sooner, well, why didnt they?
Same reason Germany didnt
>The Germans delayed Barbarossa due to personal decisions.
lol ok, then Overlord was delayed due to personal decisions
>Overlord occurred when it did because the British and Americans literally did not have the capability to launch it until mid 1944
Sounds like cope.
So Germany can do everything earlier but not the allies? hmmm
>>17785258
>everyone had rockets
The allies were ahead of Germany. Robert Goddard developed rockets before ww2.
So allies might as well have rockets in 1939 because why not? Germany gets everything early for no reason.
>How would they get it earlier?
How would Germany get anything earlier?
>We know how Germany would the get assault rifle earlier,
We actually dont.
>tell Hitler to go pound sand and give the experts the autonomy to do what they actually wanted to do.
Ok so tell Churchill to mind off from Tube Alloys program and Britain gets nukes in 1941. Easy.
>Pershing sucked
They were quite good actually and would have busted most of the Panzer 4s that were the backbone of German armour.
>no one delayed the IS
No but Soviets can have them earlier because why not? Germany gets their tech earlier.
>Comet sucked
Tank designs post-ww2 were based on Comet rather than Tigers. Cope
>no one delayed the AK
No but the Soviets can have them earlier because why not?
>no one delayed their development and they arent meaningfully better than the other heavy bombers at the time.
Dropping 4 nukes on Germany in a single run is pretty kino tho?
>>17785255
>Germany could end the war prior to 1947
Only if they surrender.
>nukes arent the superweapon you think they are.
Did I just fucking read this right?
>a unified continental Europe is food independent
Is that why Germany starved millions of people in east through the Hunger Plan despite having virtually the entire continent under occupation?
Or did the Germans do it just for fun?
6/14/2025, 2:36:19 PM
>With Jews, you lo-
Is there a bigger /pol/ cope than this? The Jews always win. Siding with the Jews ensures victory.
Is there a bigger /pol/ cope than this? The Jews always win. Siding with the Jews ensures victory.
Page 1