Search Results
7/6/2025, 8:34:32 AM
>>509636772
>>509636138
This was already explained itt. Educate yourself: >>509633555
>>509635131
https://archive.4plebs.org/x/thread/40375472/#40395107
Also,
>open pastebin:
https://pastebin.com/jk2hAdmh
>type “ctrl+f”
>type “electric”
>see section titled:
EARTH'S ELECTRIC FIELD DEBUNKS THE GLOBE
>proceed to educate yourself further
>>509636138
This was already explained itt. Educate yourself: >>509633555
>>509635131
https://archive.4plebs.org/x/thread/40375472/#40395107
Also,
>open pastebin:
https://pastebin.com/jk2hAdmh
>type “ctrl+f”
>type “electric”
>see section titled:
EARTH'S ELECTRIC FIELD DEBUNKS THE GLOBE
>proceed to educate yourself further
6/8/2025, 10:18:14 AM
>>40482993
>>40490372
Your posts itt thus far have contained absolutely no substance whatsoever - just ad homs and vague references to theories which you seem to have no actual understanding of. Since you claim to be “an electric universe guy”, how about you show me you have even a rudimentary grasp of basic electrical behavior as it pertains to observable and testable phenomena on earth. Go ahead and address the questions raised itp:
>>40432652
>>40442060
>>40451756
>there is a measurable equipotential increase of 100 volts per meter as you increase altitude from the surface of earth. Can you produce even a single example of equally increasing lines of electric potential without the use of 2 Gaussian surfaces? If not, why are you ignoring the fact that earth’s measurable electric field is irrefutable proof of the existence of a Gaussian surface above earth (ie: the firmament)?
>Going hand in hand with that question is of course the issue that a static charged spherical Earth would mean that the voltage potential is highest nearest the surface and attenuates according to R squared - not vice versa and lineally, as we observe.
>Can you provide even a single example of a static sphere that has lineally increasing voltage potential rising from its surface instead of a voltage potential that is highest near the surface which attenuates at R squared?
Surely, given your condescending remarks and vocal criticisms of flat earth, you have an answer for why the observable properties of earth’s electric field are literally impossible to replicate on a sphere or without the use of two flat Gaussian surfaces positioned perpendicular to the vertical electric field within a contained system…
>>40490372
Your posts itt thus far have contained absolutely no substance whatsoever - just ad homs and vague references to theories which you seem to have no actual understanding of. Since you claim to be “an electric universe guy”, how about you show me you have even a rudimentary grasp of basic electrical behavior as it pertains to observable and testable phenomena on earth. Go ahead and address the questions raised itp:
>>40432652
>>40442060
>>40451756
>there is a measurable equipotential increase of 100 volts per meter as you increase altitude from the surface of earth. Can you produce even a single example of equally increasing lines of electric potential without the use of 2 Gaussian surfaces? If not, why are you ignoring the fact that earth’s measurable electric field is irrefutable proof of the existence of a Gaussian surface above earth (ie: the firmament)?
>Going hand in hand with that question is of course the issue that a static charged spherical Earth would mean that the voltage potential is highest nearest the surface and attenuates according to R squared - not vice versa and lineally, as we observe.
>Can you provide even a single example of a static sphere that has lineally increasing voltage potential rising from its surface instead of a voltage potential that is highest near the surface which attenuates at R squared?
Surely, given your condescending remarks and vocal criticisms of flat earth, you have an answer for why the observable properties of earth’s electric field are literally impossible to replicate on a sphere or without the use of two flat Gaussian surfaces positioned perpendicular to the vertical electric field within a contained system…
Page 1