Search Results
7/22/2025, 9:45:34 AM
6/30/2025, 1:51:27 AM
Christcucks are perverts who hate nature so they automatically demonize exploring the bodies of young naked boys as being gay and homosexual
6/30/2025, 12:01:00 AM
Christcucks are perverts who hate nature so they automatically demonize exploring the bodies of young naked boys as being gay and homosexual
6/29/2025, 11:16:24 PM
Christcucks are perverts so they automatically demonize exploring the bodies of young boys as being gay and homosexual
6/28/2025, 2:02:45 AM
>>508914780
>There is no evidence that Hadrian was sexually involved with Antinous.
There is overwhelming evidence that Antinous was Hadrian's lover, which is why Hadrian had him deified, and is the sole reason why Hadrian brought a random, non-related eleven year old boy with him to Rome. It is consensus among historians that Antinous was the lover of Hadrian. The earliest sources which state in explicit terms they had a sexual relationship were written by Christians within living memory of Hadrian:
>Another fresh divinity was created in Egypt,—and very nearly among Greeks too,—when the Roman king solemnly elevated to the rank of god his loved-boy whose beauty was unequalled. He consecrated Antinous in the same way that Zeus consecrated Ganymedes. For lust is not easily restrained, when it has no fear; and to-day men observe the sacred nights of Antinous, which were really shameful, as the lover who kept them with him well knew. Why, I ask, do you reckon as a god one who is honoured by fornication? Why did you order that he should be mourned for as a son? Why, too, do you tell the story of his beauty? Beauty is a shameful thing when it has been blighted by outrage. Be not a tyrant, O man, over beauty, neither outrage him who is in the flower of his youth. Guard it in purity, that it may remain beautiful. Become a king over beauty, not a tyrant. Let it remain free. When you have kept its image pure, then I will acknowledge your beauty. Then I will worship beauty, when it is the true archetype of things beautiful. But now we have a tomb of the boy who was loved, a temple and a city of Antinous.
Tit. Flavius Clemens, The Exhortation to the Greeks, IV
>>508914995
>He does not mention a boy anywhere
"Beloved" in this passage is clearly referring to a boy in a pederastic relationship. You already showed in the other thread that you are not capable of comprehending ancient Greek texts.
>>508915043
Can you provide a single source which supports your claim?
>There is no evidence that Hadrian was sexually involved with Antinous.
There is overwhelming evidence that Antinous was Hadrian's lover, which is why Hadrian had him deified, and is the sole reason why Hadrian brought a random, non-related eleven year old boy with him to Rome. It is consensus among historians that Antinous was the lover of Hadrian. The earliest sources which state in explicit terms they had a sexual relationship were written by Christians within living memory of Hadrian:
>Another fresh divinity was created in Egypt,—and very nearly among Greeks too,—when the Roman king solemnly elevated to the rank of god his loved-boy whose beauty was unequalled. He consecrated Antinous in the same way that Zeus consecrated Ganymedes. For lust is not easily restrained, when it has no fear; and to-day men observe the sacred nights of Antinous, which were really shameful, as the lover who kept them with him well knew. Why, I ask, do you reckon as a god one who is honoured by fornication? Why did you order that he should be mourned for as a son? Why, too, do you tell the story of his beauty? Beauty is a shameful thing when it has been blighted by outrage. Be not a tyrant, O man, over beauty, neither outrage him who is in the flower of his youth. Guard it in purity, that it may remain beautiful. Become a king over beauty, not a tyrant. Let it remain free. When you have kept its image pure, then I will acknowledge your beauty. Then I will worship beauty, when it is the true archetype of things beautiful. But now we have a tomb of the boy who was loved, a temple and a city of Antinous.
Tit. Flavius Clemens, The Exhortation to the Greeks, IV
>>508914995
>He does not mention a boy anywhere
"Beloved" in this passage is clearly referring to a boy in a pederastic relationship. You already showed in the other thread that you are not capable of comprehending ancient Greek texts.
>>508915043
Can you provide a single source which supports your claim?
Page 1