Search Results
6/21/2025, 12:13:15 AM
Greetings!
As the conflicting interests in this world grow increasingly complex and intertwined, the perspective of finding sustainable solutions seems irredeemably lost. Some of the environments in which discernment and judgment on key global policies are formed are known to me in some detail. I have decided to use my knowledge and anecdotal experience (as subjective and limited as it may be) to bear witness and to provide, as well as I can, a one-to-one map of these realities.
We can discuss anything and I will try to reply to as many sensible messages as I can.
For starters, I consider the conflict between the Israel and Iran entities to be the most crucial and important conflict in our lifetime. In order to truly understand the nature of this conflict, one must look at the epicentre of modern history, which is the late 1970s.
Between 1976 and 1979, a split occured between two major elitarian environments - this split was inherited in the political coordinate system of the 21st century.
Environment 1: "Technocratic Neo-Feudalism" (a continuation of the Rhodesian British ImperialTradition): Institutions: CFR, Trilateral Commission, UN, European Union, Pilgrim's Society, American Security Council, Le Cercle-Pinay, Bilderberg Group. Prominent proponents: David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Arthur Schlesinger, Alvin Toeffler, Zbigniew Brzezinski. It operates under the framework of a misanthropic realism as an"ideology of no ideology". It operates under a geostratecic zionism as a means of maintaining hegemony over the eurasian land bridge. Manifestos: "The Crisis of Democracy" (1975), "The Alchemy of Finance" (1987), "The End of History" (1992).
Environment 2: Identitarian Zionism
Ideology: Rejection of liberal enlightenment and "globalism". Straussian mysticism/symbolism and jewish eschatology.
(Part 1)
As the conflicting interests in this world grow increasingly complex and intertwined, the perspective of finding sustainable solutions seems irredeemably lost. Some of the environments in which discernment and judgment on key global policies are formed are known to me in some detail. I have decided to use my knowledge and anecdotal experience (as subjective and limited as it may be) to bear witness and to provide, as well as I can, a one-to-one map of these realities.
We can discuss anything and I will try to reply to as many sensible messages as I can.
For starters, I consider the conflict between the Israel and Iran entities to be the most crucial and important conflict in our lifetime. In order to truly understand the nature of this conflict, one must look at the epicentre of modern history, which is the late 1970s.
Between 1976 and 1979, a split occured between two major elitarian environments - this split was inherited in the political coordinate system of the 21st century.
Environment 1: "Technocratic Neo-Feudalism" (a continuation of the Rhodesian British ImperialTradition): Institutions: CFR, Trilateral Commission, UN, European Union, Pilgrim's Society, American Security Council, Le Cercle-Pinay, Bilderberg Group. Prominent proponents: David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Arthur Schlesinger, Alvin Toeffler, Zbigniew Brzezinski. It operates under the framework of a misanthropic realism as an"ideology of no ideology". It operates under a geostratecic zionism as a means of maintaining hegemony over the eurasian land bridge. Manifestos: "The Crisis of Democracy" (1975), "The Alchemy of Finance" (1987), "The End of History" (1992).
Environment 2: Identitarian Zionism
Ideology: Rejection of liberal enlightenment and "globalism". Straussian mysticism/symbolism and jewish eschatology.
(Part 1)
6/20/2025, 10:11:17 PM
Greetings!
As the conflicting interests in this world grow more and more complex and intertwined, the perspective of finding sustainable solutions seems to become more and more impossible. Some of the environments in which discernment and judgment on key global policies are formed and justified are known to me in some detail. I have decided to use my knowledge and anecdotal experience (as subjective and limited as it may be) to bear witness and to provide as much of a one-to-one map of these conflicting realities.
You can ask me any questions you would like, except for those that I might deem too personal.
For starters, I consider the conflict between the Israel and Iran entities to be the most crucial and important conflict in our lifetime. In order to truly understand the nature of this conflict, one must look at the epicentre of modern history, which is the late 1970s.
Between 1976 and 1979, a split occured between two environments that are in a profoundly naive way believed to be effectively identical by many political observers. This split however is deeply ingrained in the political coordinate system of the 21st century.
Environment 1: "Technocratic Neo-Feudalism" (a continuation of the Rhodesian British ImperialTradition): Institutions: CFR, Trilateral Commission, UN, European Union, Pilgrim's Society, American Security Council, Le Cercle-Pinay, Bilderberg Group. Prominent proponents: David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Arthur Schlesinger, Alvin Toeffler, Zbigniew Brzezinski. It operates under the framework of a misanthropic realism as an"ideology of no ideology". It operates under a geostratecic zionism as a means of maintaining hegemony over the eurasian land bridge. Manifestos: "The Crisis of Democracy" (1975), "The Alchemy of Finance" (1987), "The End of History" (1992).
Environment 2: Identitarian Zionism
Ideology: Rejection of liberal enlightenment and "globalism". Straussian mysticism/symbolism and jewish eschatology.
(Part 1)
As the conflicting interests in this world grow more and more complex and intertwined, the perspective of finding sustainable solutions seems to become more and more impossible. Some of the environments in which discernment and judgment on key global policies are formed and justified are known to me in some detail. I have decided to use my knowledge and anecdotal experience (as subjective and limited as it may be) to bear witness and to provide as much of a one-to-one map of these conflicting realities.
You can ask me any questions you would like, except for those that I might deem too personal.
For starters, I consider the conflict between the Israel and Iran entities to be the most crucial and important conflict in our lifetime. In order to truly understand the nature of this conflict, one must look at the epicentre of modern history, which is the late 1970s.
Between 1976 and 1979, a split occured between two environments that are in a profoundly naive way believed to be effectively identical by many political observers. This split however is deeply ingrained in the political coordinate system of the 21st century.
Environment 1: "Technocratic Neo-Feudalism" (a continuation of the Rhodesian British ImperialTradition): Institutions: CFR, Trilateral Commission, UN, European Union, Pilgrim's Society, American Security Council, Le Cercle-Pinay, Bilderberg Group. Prominent proponents: David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Arthur Schlesinger, Alvin Toeffler, Zbigniew Brzezinski. It operates under the framework of a misanthropic realism as an"ideology of no ideology". It operates under a geostratecic zionism as a means of maintaining hegemony over the eurasian land bridge. Manifestos: "The Crisis of Democracy" (1975), "The Alchemy of Finance" (1987), "The End of History" (1992).
Environment 2: Identitarian Zionism
Ideology: Rejection of liberal enlightenment and "globalism". Straussian mysticism/symbolism and jewish eschatology.
(Part 1)
Page 1