Search Results
7/14/2025, 10:27:55 AM
>>510340791
>Age gaps were frowned upon all throughout history
Things pulled out of your ass.
People got married young and since not everyone's wife dropped dead age gaps were less common.
You'd have your wife, have lots of kids with her and your pair bonding and societal pressure against infidelity kept you with her even as you both aged. If sexual attraction died, you'd pull through for your family and fuck whores in secret.
If a guy was a widower, he didn't try to re-marry a woman within his age group, he went right back to the pool of single women available for marriage which were as I said earlier, were young, because women were expected to marry young and spend their lives with a husband less they become whores or street filth.
Widows were stereotyped since antiquity as being doomed, or undesirable because single men even in their age range didn't care for them and could again, just seek a young woman seeking to marry. Some Widows found husbands but it was a big enough deal that laws were made to keep widows from being ruined just because their husbands died.
When all that shit dissolved after the female employment and the sexual revolution, that's where men who never married and bounced from woman to woman popped up; that's when you started to see the trend of feminists starting to seethe at their behavior and argue that since women were free from needing men that men should instead replace the tradition of keeping a wife that aged with them with different unrelated partners simply "because'.
Essentially, by destroying marriage women destroyed a reason for men to stay within their age groups. There isn't a reason beyond pair bonding and commitment to family, a single man going through one night stands will pursue younger women regardless of how old he gets. Women can make up how "society says you're a creep" but in the short time frame marriage has destroyed does any of that sound like truth?
>Age gaps were frowned upon all throughout history
Things pulled out of your ass.
People got married young and since not everyone's wife dropped dead age gaps were less common.
You'd have your wife, have lots of kids with her and your pair bonding and societal pressure against infidelity kept you with her even as you both aged. If sexual attraction died, you'd pull through for your family and fuck whores in secret.
If a guy was a widower, he didn't try to re-marry a woman within his age group, he went right back to the pool of single women available for marriage which were as I said earlier, were young, because women were expected to marry young and spend their lives with a husband less they become whores or street filth.
Widows were stereotyped since antiquity as being doomed, or undesirable because single men even in their age range didn't care for them and could again, just seek a young woman seeking to marry. Some Widows found husbands but it was a big enough deal that laws were made to keep widows from being ruined just because their husbands died.
When all that shit dissolved after the female employment and the sexual revolution, that's where men who never married and bounced from woman to woman popped up; that's when you started to see the trend of feminists starting to seethe at their behavior and argue that since women were free from needing men that men should instead replace the tradition of keeping a wife that aged with them with different unrelated partners simply "because'.
Essentially, by destroying marriage women destroyed a reason for men to stay within their age groups. There isn't a reason beyond pair bonding and commitment to family, a single man going through one night stands will pursue younger women regardless of how old he gets. Women can make up how "society says you're a creep" but in the short time frame marriage has destroyed does any of that sound like truth?
6/18/2025, 1:15:33 AM
>>712946951
I played it when I borrowed my sisters PS4 that she got to play dog shit like The Last of Us.
It was a pretty good game but after DaS III and Elden Ring it wasn't this god tier thing.
I think I can understand the feeling of going from DaS, suffering DaS II disappointment and then playing BB, the sheer quality of the experience is immense.
But after all the other From Games?
It's clearly not this perfect thing and I had plenty of gripes with it. I feel like snoys have been trying to bog down every From release after it to try and keep the idea that Sony still has "The best From Soft game".
I played it when I borrowed my sisters PS4 that she got to play dog shit like The Last of Us.
It was a pretty good game but after DaS III and Elden Ring it wasn't this god tier thing.
I think I can understand the feeling of going from DaS, suffering DaS II disappointment and then playing BB, the sheer quality of the experience is immense.
But after all the other From Games?
It's clearly not this perfect thing and I had plenty of gripes with it. I feel like snoys have been trying to bog down every From release after it to try and keep the idea that Sony still has "The best From Soft game".
Page 1