Andronovo and Harrapean.

>>510774357
>>510774674
>>510775283
>>510775810
>>510775997

>>510767431
TOPKEK I finally found a poojeet with a sense of humor.

>>510643472
Cry more Ranjit

>>510589282
Poo

Check out how much Indians have changed since the 16h century, surely the future is bright:

French account (16th c.)
>Indian craftsmen…were ‘indolent’ and ‘vile’ by their very nature

Jemima Kindersley (1760s)
>In her letters she refers to Indians as having “stupidity and low cunning,” framing them as inherently backward

Abbe J.A. Dubois (early 19th c.)
>described Hindu customs as "abominable and revolting," compared Hindus to cannibals, calling their habits "disgusting" and their food "revolting."

Rev. Hobart Caunter (1834)
>described the Bengalese as "notoriously licentious" and hill men as "servile, deceptive and cunning, utterly without honour or principle"

Charles Grant & James Mill (early 19th c.)
>Grant described Hindus as “a people exceedingly depraved,” and ridiculed Sanskrit medicine, astronomy, history, and geography as laughable nonsense. James Mill called Indians contemptuously “cowardly, unfeeling and mendacious”

John Bacon (1840)
>Bacon describes Hindus as “inert” and filled with “low cunning,” “superstition” and “fulsome sycophancy.” He complains their language is “a heap of allegories,” condemns Hindu beliefs as “absurd” and “monstrous,” and portrays the entire group as lacking compassion compared to the British

Charles Dickens (mid-19th c.)
>In a private correspondence, Dickens described Indians: “Look at the dogs, low, treacherous, murderous, tigerous villains.” He even endorsed extreme violence, calling for the “extermination” of Indian people and approving the mutilation of “wretched Hindoo”

Sir Richard Francis Burton (1850s travelogues)
>Indians are a “cowardly and slavish people”

Blackwood’s Magazine (1850s)
>Indians are “dark-skinned rapists,” “rapacious savages menacing the virtue of Britain”

Mark Twain (1897)
>expressed disgust at the Ganges, stating, "the memory of that sight will always stay by me, but not by request"

Most dating is now done online and most non-Whites can’t compete against Whites in hypergamy, incel.

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2023/02/08/for-valentines-day-5-facts-about-single-americans/
>47% of Black adults report being single, higher than the share among other racial and ethnic groups.

https://mashable.com/article/racism-online-dating
>Asian, Latina, and white straight women all refuse messages from Black men -2021

https://www.ucpress.edu/blog/54733/dating-while-black-online-but-invisible/
>Black men and women daters were particularly discriminated compared to other minority daters. White straight women are twice as likely to respond to White men compared to Black men. -2022

https://www.inverse.com/culture/36379-tinder-black-women-asian-men-racism
>“Black and Latin men faced ‘similar discrimination,’ while white men had ratings “most high among women of all races.”

https://www.futurity.org/racism-dating-apps-2890062-2/
>White women were the most discriminatory in their exclusion of Black daters, which is also an important finding.

https://news.stanford.edu/2019/08/21/online-dating-popular-way-u-s-couples-meet/
>Meeting online has become the most popular way U.S. couples connect, Stanford sociologist finds

https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2016/02/college-aged-adults-are-now-the-most-likely-online-daters/462384/
>College-Aged Adults Are Now the Most Likely Online Daters

https://www.nimbleappgenie.com/blogs/dating-app-statistics/#
>Online dating platform use is fairly equal among races, with 29% of white people, 31% of black people, and 28% of Hispanic people having used a dating app

>>509313574
Please nuke brampton ontario

Every aspect of jeet existence revolves around subversion. And that subversion destroys their millieu.
>Falsified certifications and nepotism? destroying institutions from within
>Flooding paper mills + cheating during assignments/exams? Devaluing degrees and entire colleges
>Circumventing real estate and rental rules? Destroying mortgage systems and markets
>Prioritising short term profits for shareholders? Destroying the legacy and intellectual capital of companies
>Circumventing visa and asylum rules? Ruining immigration systems
>Food banks? Destroying trust and charities in the process
>Plagiarism and data falsification in academia? Destroying scholarships, universities and journals
>And to top it off? Insular and entirely self-serving
You are a self-propagating system of exploitation. You can only thrive by feeding on pre-existing systems of wealth. This is why you only celebrate the success of diaspora Indians while idiotically defending your cultural practises back home. You are a plague.

>>509107538
I think as a White man with presumably impressive stature and strength relative to the poop species, putting poojeets in their place on behalf of the native Thai people would be highly appreciated by them. I would see it as your way to serve the community. Thai anon can correct me if I'm wrong.

>>508806510
Fecaloids will never be human, Ackshit.

>>508805250
What would it take to formally rectify this colossal misclassification? Science must never yield to political pressure.

>>508763260

Your only one life was wasted as a jeet.
It’s better to be dead than live as a jeet.