Search Results

Found 5 results for "b53c2941e7a267d94880752fe271733a" across all boards searching md5.

Anonymous /tg/96160193#96163741
7/23/2025, 10:55:36 PM
>>96160193
>Confess your bgg sins. What's that slop game you're always down to play?
King of Tokyo. If anyone has a better light dice chucker to recommend then I am all ears. Bonus points if it plays up to 6 and is very interactive.
Anonymous ID: R/qDUntHUnited Kingdom /pol/510066441#510098558
7/11/2025, 5:29:27 PM
>>510066441
>Caring what W*men think
NGMI
Anonymous ID: ZJIWqkkcUnited States /pol/510092546#510094870
7/11/2025, 4:35:01 PM
>>510092546
I don't care what women think
Anonymous ID: kQgKyUHVUnited States /pol/509952490#509963590
7/10/2025, 1:10:11 AM
>>509952490
Student loans are just an IQ test. You failed the test. Rewarding low IQ people is called dysgenics and it leads to degradation of the human species.
Anonymous /ic/7630305#7630518
7/3/2025, 5:00:02 AM
>>7630305
It means that artmaking is an anethical and amoral pursuit.

It does not operate by deontological rules, there are no "must nots" that are unique to art.
Its subjective nature also means that consequentialist rules also don't apply.
This means that you have only virtue ethics to guide it, but even then the only virtue that universally apply to artmaking is "make authentic art", the remainder are really moreso about conduct and mentality (CJTheX's 7 Deadly Art Sins goes into both and Greg Guevarra Circles of Art Hell video goes into the latter type.)

So really, you have to basically determine what art you like, and then make that. This means get in touch with your authentic self, then your rubric for judging your own art is based on that, and you can use anything you want to attain a good result based on that. And you can say "fuck off" to anyone else who tries to impose their own rubric onto your art in a majorly mismatched way, while connecting with people whose rubric lines up closer.