>>713982349
>Imagine defending Nintendo for charging 80-90 dollars for a fucking video game. And I thought SNES and N64 games were expensive. At least these old consoles had the excuse of cartridges being expensive to be made. What's Nintendo Switch 2's excuse? Taking advance of consoomers willing to pay so much just for a video game?

Have you ever had a thought of your own or do you just skim youtube and twitter for what to think?

>>713175497
>>713175523
Why do I need to answer your question if you don't care? It doesn't matter what my answer is, you've already decided you're just going to say "it's not important," because your whole argument depends on you not caring. It's a colossal waste of time.
If you don't care, then just shut up and go away. Don't waste everyone's time with a question you already have an answer to.