>>149551765
Aztec Batman's Mesoamerican stuff is league's more researched then anything in Fate

Aside from ironically the generic Ocelomeh enemies, which are well done, see pic

>>716293341
>>716292036
>>716291861
cont:

For the 60k figure to be valid, you'd have to go with the absolute highest end variables that the Counting Skulls/Cubic Density paper I linked accounts for, and the excavations show the rack's actual dimensions and pole values are smaller then that. It holding 60k skulls is just straight up disproven

I did put a * next to the word "rack" last post tho, for two reasons: The first is that IIRC it's unclear if the dimensions I gave for the rack's area is actually for the rack itself, or the PLATFORM the rack was on,: If the latter, then the rack was even smaller. Conversely, all of the numbers I've gone over are for the /rack/, not the two cylindrical towers flanking it: those probably had a few thousand extra skulls but i'm kinda pulling "a few thousand" out my ass there, based on some infographs showing a fraction of one of the tower holding the ~600 excavated skulls from one of the towers many articles talk abou, but I don't know if those graphics are actually showing the exact portion of the tower in question and if you can extrapolate from that or not: maybe they're just showing a arbitrary portion for the sake of the graphic?

Additionally, a lot of the wording in various reports implies that the tower height as shown in >>716289940 is a minimum, so they may have been taller. Some articles even imply that the height of the rack itself isn't as known for sure as the width and length. So maybe the entire rack + tower combo had more like 20,000 or 30,000 skulls. But 60k is out of the question.

>>716290104
Probably not, can you link it? I and my friend group have only done very short Fate breakdowns since we (well, most of us) only think the Ocelomeh are decently done, see pic

>>716293916
see
>>716281494
>>716284939
Tell me what stuff you think in the depictions I've said are inaccurate are actually accurate, or what stuff in the ones I've said are accurate you think isn't. I'll back up my perspective with proof.

15/?

>>713351846
cont:

>>713349672
>>713351190
No, see >>713351846

>>713348615
had to exclude this (and the above two) from the last post because of the dumb new quote spam limit

2/2 for now, also take this bonus image by a friend of mine and I did explaining why ironically enough the best Mesoamerican Fate design is the nonspecific cannon fodder generic Ocelomeh enemies