Search Results
7/1/2025, 7:12:07 PM
>>17805548
>Let me ask you this: if you believe Jesus is God, then wasn’t it Jesus who spoke the words of the Old Testament, including Genesis 12:3?
Genesis 12:3 is God's inspired word, and Jesus is God.
>On what grounds, then, do you allow Paul ( a man whose authority was disputed even by other apostles ) to override the direct speech of God?
I don't think he does. The book of Genesis always indicated that there would be a single seed who would inherit all the promises.
"And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel."
- Genesis 3:15
"That in blessing I will bless thee, and in multiplying I will multiply thy seed as the stars of the heaven, and as the sand which is upon the sea shore; and thy seed shall possess the gate of his enemies;"
- Genesis 22:17
I did not come up with those verses, it comes from the Bible.
>Do you follow the words of Christ, or have you made Paul your final authority?
The apostles were divinely inspired to give us the New Testament. See the words of Jesus Christ in the Gospel of John.
"I have given them thy word; and the world hath hated them, because they are not of the world, even as I am not of the world.
I pray not that thou shouldest take them out of the world, but that thou shouldest keep them from the evil.
They are not of the world, even as I am not of the world.
Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth.
As thou hast sent me into the world, even so have I also sent them into the world."
- John 17:14-18
>Let me ask you this: if you believe Jesus is God, then wasn’t it Jesus who spoke the words of the Old Testament, including Genesis 12:3?
Genesis 12:3 is God's inspired word, and Jesus is God.
>On what grounds, then, do you allow Paul ( a man whose authority was disputed even by other apostles ) to override the direct speech of God?
I don't think he does. The book of Genesis always indicated that there would be a single seed who would inherit all the promises.
"And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel."
- Genesis 3:15
"That in blessing I will bless thee, and in multiplying I will multiply thy seed as the stars of the heaven, and as the sand which is upon the sea shore; and thy seed shall possess the gate of his enemies;"
- Genesis 22:17
I did not come up with those verses, it comes from the Bible.
>Do you follow the words of Christ, or have you made Paul your final authority?
The apostles were divinely inspired to give us the New Testament. See the words of Jesus Christ in the Gospel of John.
"I have given them thy word; and the world hath hated them, because they are not of the world, even as I am not of the world.
I pray not that thou shouldest take them out of the world, but that thou shouldest keep them from the evil.
They are not of the world, even as I am not of the world.
Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth.
As thou hast sent me into the world, even so have I also sent them into the world."
- John 17:14-18
6/23/2025, 8:27:13 PM
>>17785752
>Didn’t Pontius Pilate in, Matthew 27:25, wash his hands in blood and said, “ Let Jesus' blood be on us Romans and on our Roman children!”??
That's not what Matthew 27:25 says. Verse 25 tells us what the crowd shouted out, while verse 24 tells us what Pilate said. Try not to get the two confused as you seem to have done. See the two verses in context below:
"When Pilate saw that he could prevail nothing, but that rather a tumult was made, he took water, and washed his hands before the multitude, saying, I am innocent of the blood of this just person: see ye to it.
Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children." (Matthew 27:24-25)
>Didn’t Pontius Pilate in, Matthew 27:25, wash his hands in blood and said, “ Let Jesus' blood be on us Romans and on our Roman children!”??
That's not what Matthew 27:25 says. Verse 25 tells us what the crowd shouted out, while verse 24 tells us what Pilate said. Try not to get the two confused as you seem to have done. See the two verses in context below:
"When Pilate saw that he could prevail nothing, but that rather a tumult was made, he took water, and washed his hands before the multitude, saying, I am innocent of the blood of this just person: see ye to it.
Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children." (Matthew 27:24-25)
6/22/2025, 7:51:55 AM
>>17779819
>Didn’t Pontius Pilate in, Matthew 27:25, wash his hands in blood and said, “ Let Jesus' blood be on us Romans and on our Roman children!”??
That's not what Matthew 27:25 says. Verse 25 tells us what the crowd shouted out, while verse 24 tells us what Pilate said. Try not to get the two confused as you seem to have done. See the two verses in context below:
"When Pilate saw that he could prevail nothing, but that rather a tumult was made, he took water, and washed his hands before the multitude, saying, I am innocent of the blood of this just person: see ye to it.
Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children." (Matthew 27:24-25)
>Didn’t Pontius Pilate in, Matthew 27:25, wash his hands in blood and said, “ Let Jesus' blood be on us Romans and on our Roman children!”??
That's not what Matthew 27:25 says. Verse 25 tells us what the crowd shouted out, while verse 24 tells us what Pilate said. Try not to get the two confused as you seem to have done. See the two verses in context below:
"When Pilate saw that he could prevail nothing, but that rather a tumult was made, he took water, and washed his hands before the multitude, saying, I am innocent of the blood of this just person: see ye to it.
Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children." (Matthew 27:24-25)
6/19/2025, 9:08:57 AM
>>17775176
"Jesus said unto him, It is written again, Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God."
- Matthew 4:7
"Jesus said unto him, It is written again, Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God."
- Matthew 4:7
6/13/2025, 3:22:49 AM
>>17759712
>If a man takes your wife, give him your daughter as well.
No, that goes against Scripture.
"But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel."
- 1 Timothy 5:8
You seem to be confusing personal offenses with allowing others to be harmed, which is not what the Sermon on the Mount is about. Allowing other people to be harmed is more an atheist thing.
>If a man takes your wife, give him your daughter as well.
No, that goes against Scripture.
"But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel."
- 1 Timothy 5:8
You seem to be confusing personal offenses with allowing others to be harmed, which is not what the Sermon on the Mount is about. Allowing other people to be harmed is more an atheist thing.
Page 1