>>715058403
>>715057769
They know, but they're twitter addicts, or if they're not a majority of those around them are twitter addicts. They get shamed by twitter peopel and try to appeal to twitter people. In part because they're clueless nobodies who know nothing and no one is there to stop them, and they have otherwise very little power. They can't decide if a project si made, what genre, but they can ensure it doesn't have "the male gaze".

Powerful

>>714287808
LOL

Are the suits getting scared and cancelling all the ugly women games?

>development since 2018

Is this the pattern? AAA western devs toil away for fucking ever, produce nothing, then the game is cancelled? Not a single person at these companies gives a shit about the product, and seem to treat it like a giant welfare program for women. This is like the 10th example of this?

Westerners seem incapable of producing ANYTHING right nwo.

>work for years producing nothing
>be paid for all of your work the entire time
>you make an entire career out of this
>a non zero number of people care about you losing this stipend and treat you as if you were an actual person and not a bipedal parasite

We have reached something between survival mode and post scarcity, if you pay attention it seems that as much as 80% of a first world economy is actually devoted to producing nothing or producing more things that do, or its doing something but at extreme inefficiency.

The survival strategy most middle class game devs in the west have settled upon is to act like parasites to suck up as many resources and to keep game development going as long as possible because the job market is so hard, and to try to justify your own existance while doing as little as possible. A kind of corporate welfare program, mostly for white women and brown women.

>>714278242
at least they're learning. go woke, get broke