Search Results
ID: LBKuaSwg/pol/512538704#512561583
8/8/2025, 10:32:12 PM
>>512559959
You technically could argue that, but the sinple issue is that it's just not true.
We know that the universe exists, or that nature will continue to be uniform, or that there aren't flying spaghetti monsters, ad infinitum, God makes me know.
If you're asking the process, I don't know.
So it's often unnecessary and not entertained like any other obvious falsehoods, like paganism. Which is how it died. And Islam. Unless circumstances.
That is to say, atheists always choose the most horrific examples to make their point. Which ends up in irony.
Things we already know.
You technically could argue that, but the sinple issue is that it's just not true.
We know that the universe exists, or that nature will continue to be uniform, or that there aren't flying spaghetti monsters, ad infinitum, God makes me know.
If you're asking the process, I don't know.
So it's often unnecessary and not entertained like any other obvious falsehoods, like paganism. Which is how it died. And Islam. Unless circumstances.
That is to say, atheists always choose the most horrific examples to make their point. Which ends up in irony.
Things we already know.
8/8/2025, 10:23:28 PM
>>17906894
You could technically argue, but that's not true.
So it's often unnecessary and not entertained like any other obvious falsehoods, like paganism. Which is how it died. And Islam. Unless circumstances.
That is to say, atheists always choose the most horrific examples to make their point. Which ends up in irony.
Things we already know.
You could technically argue, but that's not true.
So it's often unnecessary and not entertained like any other obvious falsehoods, like paganism. Which is how it died. And Islam. Unless circumstances.
That is to say, atheists always choose the most horrific examples to make their point. Which ends up in irony.
Things we already know.
Page 1