Search Results
ID: 2i9fchRf/pol/507589922#507596731
6/16/2025, 5:07:57 PM
>>507595896
I am no longer a Trump supporter!
Trump protects israel,a known war criminal!
Netanyahu is NOT protecting Trump!
IMPEACH TRUMP!
I am no longer a Trump supporter!
Trump protects israel,a known war criminal!
Netanyahu is NOT protecting Trump!
IMPEACH TRUMP!
ID: XeJbqS2F/pol/507284366#507290415
6/14/2025, 3:09:45 AM
>>507288542
>Yeah Iran knows he's full of shit. Even if he publicly denounces israel we've seen he can't be trusted. He'll encourage israel to do whatever the fuck they want privately.
yeah... and trump was scheduled for another peace talk with iran o the 15th, and instead of being discouraged about it, Trump is saying "good job, good attack!"
and that is because trump knew of the plan...
fuck trump. thats slimy as fuck, thats a violation of wartime laws .. and iran and israel arent even at war and netanyahu is still commiting war crimes
trump cannot more blatantly encourage war crimes if he tried...
trump was part of a diversion, not part of peace talks .. disgusting!
>>507289152
>If sandniggers could make good choice I don't think you will be here in the first place
what do you mean?
>Yeah Iran knows he's full of shit. Even if he publicly denounces israel we've seen he can't be trusted. He'll encourage israel to do whatever the fuck they want privately.
yeah... and trump was scheduled for another peace talk with iran o the 15th, and instead of being discouraged about it, Trump is saying "good job, good attack!"
and that is because trump knew of the plan...
fuck trump. thats slimy as fuck, thats a violation of wartime laws .. and iran and israel arent even at war and netanyahu is still commiting war crimes
trump cannot more blatantly encourage war crimes if he tried...
trump was part of a diversion, not part of peace talks .. disgusting!
>>507289152
>If sandniggers could make good choice I don't think you will be here in the first place
what do you mean?
ID: n396PTcp/pol/507276293#507283280
6/14/2025, 1:52:44 AM
Israel’s alleged June 12, 2025, missile attack on Iran, including assassinations, during peace talks, could violate international law, including the UN Charter, Geneva Conventions, and customary rules of war. Below is a concise list of main violations, emphasizing key legal codes, in under 2000 characters.
UN Charter Violations:
Article 2(4): Unlawful use of force against Iran’s sovereignty via missile strikes on nuclear/military sites without imminent threat, violating territorial integrity.
Article 51: Preemptive attack lacks evidence of an armed attack or imminent danger, failing self-defense criteria; planned strikes undermine necessity.
Threat to Peace: Strikes during US-Iran nuclear talks destabilize diplomacy, breaching Charter’s peace objectives.
Geneva Conventions Violations:
Common Article 3/Additional Protocol I: Targeting civilians (e.g., scientists, families) or civilian objects violates distinction principle.
Article 51(3), Protocol I: Assassinations of military leaders/scientists may constitute extrajudicial killings if not directly participating in hostilities.
Proportionality: 200+ jets hitting 100+ targets, causing 78 deaths/320 injuries, suggests excessive civilian harm, breaching proportionality rule.
Precautions: Failure to minimize civilian casualties in densely populated areas violates obligation to take feasible precautions.
Customary International Humanitarian Law (IHL):
Sovereignty Breach: Strikes on Iranian soil (e.g., Natanz, Tehran) infringe sovereignty; use of Iraqi airspace violates Iraq’s sovereignty.
Aggression: Attack aligns with UN Resolution 3314 (1974) definition of aggression, potentially a crime under Rome Statute.
Nuclear Facility Attacks: Strikes on nuclear sites risk environmental/humanitarian harm, violating IHL’s prohibition on indiscriminate effects.
Bad Faith Diplomacy: Attacking during peace talks undermines good-faith obligations, risking broader conflict contrary to UN Charter’s preamble.
UN Charter Violations:
Article 2(4): Unlawful use of force against Iran’s sovereignty via missile strikes on nuclear/military sites without imminent threat, violating territorial integrity.
Article 51: Preemptive attack lacks evidence of an armed attack or imminent danger, failing self-defense criteria; planned strikes undermine necessity.
Threat to Peace: Strikes during US-Iran nuclear talks destabilize diplomacy, breaching Charter’s peace objectives.
Geneva Conventions Violations:
Common Article 3/Additional Protocol I: Targeting civilians (e.g., scientists, families) or civilian objects violates distinction principle.
Article 51(3), Protocol I: Assassinations of military leaders/scientists may constitute extrajudicial killings if not directly participating in hostilities.
Proportionality: 200+ jets hitting 100+ targets, causing 78 deaths/320 injuries, suggests excessive civilian harm, breaching proportionality rule.
Precautions: Failure to minimize civilian casualties in densely populated areas violates obligation to take feasible precautions.
Customary International Humanitarian Law (IHL):
Sovereignty Breach: Strikes on Iranian soil (e.g., Natanz, Tehran) infringe sovereignty; use of Iraqi airspace violates Iraq’s sovereignty.
Aggression: Attack aligns with UN Resolution 3314 (1974) definition of aggression, potentially a crime under Rome Statute.
Nuclear Facility Attacks: Strikes on nuclear sites risk environmental/humanitarian harm, violating IHL’s prohibition on indiscriminate effects.
Bad Faith Diplomacy: Attacking during peace talks undermines good-faith obligations, risking broader conflict contrary to UN Charter’s preamble.
6/14/2025, 12:19:00 AM
>>527320246
SEE
SEE
6/13/2025, 8:37:26 PM
Page 1