>>96141692
>I'm older, I come from a generation where hot/cute warrior chicks were a completely normal thing in fantasy and no one was weird about it.
This clearly isn't that at all. It's a war on femininity, and creativity by proxy.
The units are made to be unisex, the women androgynous and ugly, on purpose by ideologues. This is not an inspired decision, it's a diversity quota.
The Underworlds warband leader is arguably better, just because they went in for making her this comically ugly matriarch figure.
There is at least some character in that compared to every new release having this modern western notion that "anything men can do woman can also obviously do, and they participate in compareable numbers".
It's just such shit writing, with the designers cramming their modern world views into fantasy settings.
It's not "fantastical and awesome women, doing incredible things". This is not warrior princess Xena.

>>713253795
>Everyone catches on that it's better to make >1 minute animations
> Less work, consistent scheduled release, maintain viewerbase, better for Patreon, more content, maintain relevance, able to hop on trends and new flavor of the month characters
>Be subverse devs
>Spend years on a single ugly game Ona single fetish with a limited cast of ugly characters locked behind a poorly designed game you need to spend money and time just to code
>Be subverse devs
>Scratch your heads why it bombed

>>712883132
Yes because futa is like the Trojan horse of faggotry. Futa is unironically so much gayer than just using a male stand in, but you niggers deceptively ask for it tricking anons into staring too much at dicks instead of the girl. It leads to porno psychosis and can snowball into tranny chasing which is FUCKING GAY