Kant's psychology is identical to that of of the mathematical crank
>One obvious characteristic of the trisector is that they are old. The trisector heard of the trisection in his geometry class, but did not succeed with his construction until many years later.
One point for Kant being a crank - didn't write the critique until he was in his 50s
>A third characteristic of trisectors is that they do not know much mathematics.
He included a refutation of Berkeley despite never reading Berkeley. He shit on Thomas Reid despite never reading Thomas Reid. he learned aristotelian logic in school, but never really engaged with aristotle and probably couldn't read greek. he claimed to have refuted leibniz despite only being familiar with leibniz indirectly through wolff, and probably didn't even read wolff but only knew about it because it was being taught in his school.
> "tell me a thing is impossible and I will immediately set to work on it"
hume said it was impossible to prove the universal validity of causality and Kant went fucking insane. in his efforts to prove causality was valid, he accepted all kinds of absurd propositions and made incoherent arguments in support of them, and then what he actually ended up proving was not that causality was necessary or valid, but that we can't help but to use causality, which is nothing more than what hume already said, similarly to how trisectors claimed to have constructed a trisection when in reality they only constructed an approximation.
>Trisectors draw complicated diagrams... Without exception, the constructions can be simplified, sometimes drastically... Perhaps they think that complexity is impressive or... perhaps they are a bit unsure of their work and think that errors will be harder to find in a complicated diagram with many letters.
Kant's arguments are pointlessly repetitive and long. He obscures his premises behind as much retarded vocabulary as possible, and he does not use his own definitions consistently as almost every commentator on Kant has pointed out.
>It is virtually impossible to convince them that they have made an error.
Many people responded to kant and showed him his errors, of course his response was simply to claim that they did not understand his work. It is the same with the Kant shills on this board.
>Some trisectors waste vast amounts of mathematical time. A 1951 trisector, aged 82 at the time, broadcast his constructions... to over 100 places in all. He had more than 60 replies! Think how many mathematician hours went into producing those answers, some of which the trisector excerpted in his next widely distributed letter.
Kant RUINED philosophy because later philosopher all felt the need to refute Kant and devote entire books to him. It's even worse because Kant obscures his actual arguments so much, that the philosophers tie themselves into knots trying to make it make sense. Kant completely derailed philosophy for 200 years at least.

kant was a psychopath and a narcissist. Kant hated good things and loved evil. once Kant saw a dead bird and was overwhelmed with love for the evil universe. Kant is an archon of decay. Imagine being Kant's poor retarded manservant Lampe and having to be in the same room as Kant every day. I am certain that Kant performed acts of vampirism on Lampe like the brain bugs in starship troopers. He probably forced Lampe to write his lectures and to write the critique of pure reaon and then took credit for it himself. Kant liked looking at a clock tower for hours every day because he delighted in the impending doom of humanity which comes closer with every second-hand strike. Worst of all, he wrote "optimistic" books about eternal progress and kingdoms of ends only to entrap us in false narratives to make our pain as acute as possible upon disillusionment. Kant wrote the original manuscript of the critique of pure reason in the blood of innocent passersby who he would spot on his daily walk and invite to his notorious dinner parties. Kant was a fierce opponent of Edward Jenner's vaccine because he wanted people to die slow and painful deaths from the pox. Kant enjoyed contemplating the heavens because he thought the vast black distances between everything and the impossibility of escaping the hellscape of earth to be among the most delightful prospects imaginable. Kant made the paper upon which the critique of pure reason was writ himself from the bodies of goats that he would meticulously torture in his satanic rituals. Kant used black magic to subvert Francis Bacon's attempt to repurpose alchemy for positive activities and led directly to the hell of modern mathematical physics so that he could purposely trap humanity on the wrong path. now there will be no going back. Kant hates babies and that's why he never had any children, he mostly hated them because they didn't have as much blood as adults which he could use as ink. Kant merely saw humans as phenomenal images floating across the screen of his consciousness, unable to comprehend their existence as conscious beings like him. I have seen Kant in my dreams and I know that he is still torturing animals and manservants in hell to this day. In the early 20th century Kant used black magic from hell to cause the universe to expand at an accelerating rate, trapping the cycle in the kali yuga. the only hope is to exit this universe entirely