>>81843046
if you actually try touching grass and meeting people, you'd not say this platitude, as you'd notice quite a damn lot are abrasive, disgusting, dismissive, want to wrap you under their narrative, can throw you under the bus if there's enough plausible deniability. hostility just switches the trash encircling you to straightforward and manageable"grrrr I want to fix or exclude this overly sovereign anon like in my heroic story narratives I'm fed!". people at their best aren't worth it due to the tiresome toxic fume they already are at their neutral. I'm proven wrong only a few times out of thousands I can recall at least vaguely

>>81656519
>intellectually invasive
good. male or female, nerds are rapemeat

logics is literally assumption-based invention from munchausen's trilemma principles, allowed to exist due to empirical convenience. forcing logics into empirics inconvenience - before you get empirical convenience as a result - is "the hamner works on nails, so I should hit my head to solve a bad mood"
you're calling out a geologist when you're trying to build architecture on a swamp.