>>60618688
Yes, like Interledger Protocol, optimized using XRP, which allows them to forego nostro/vostro locked liquidity, made liquid cross-asset tokenized on any chain or network public or private.

>>60618758
The lawsuit is built around sales from several years prior which at times dealt with OTC sales to institutions and marketing. Their foreign product is built around exchanges mostly. The lawsuit had them adjust their US based strategy to stablecoins in the interim due to the injunction but no ruled that secondary sales do not qualify as securities offerings freeing them to broaden the form they described in the video explicity using the exchanges to the US, but US banks do not yet have sufficient clarity to use any crypto in large batch settlement, nor have messaging standards migrated yet to be able to handle them in messaging in a generalized way (this change is happening to Fedwire literally a few days from now after 70 years and 15 years of strategizing and standards roundtabling). The type of offering they were doing was demand neutral because you buy on one exchange and sell on another or because it was sold OTC with no market hit. Now micropayments will process in a way that burns XRP while liquidity providers and Ripple’s buybacks absorb XRP, reducing sell-side impact. Additionally, escrow management and RLUSD fees indirectly increase XRP demand, undermining neutrality. Ripple alone have bought billions from the secondary market in XRP. Everyone who usees XRP is incentivized to own XRP and to see its price as high as possible because its efficiency increases as volatility decreases. Unlike Chainlink which is faster and more secure and cheaper using CLL subsidized private software for price feeds without the token and one of 30 more efficient public or private chains for actual value storage and settlement.