>>17838748
>>17839169
Dumbass doesn't realize E1b has to enter the Greek genepool at one point or the other. It's the predominant modern Greek haplogroup after all.
>>17839271
>Therefore, since no one has shown a consistent and accurate definition of what a Doric is or how we differentiate them from the natives, everything is open to being Dorico in this pathetic thread
Regardless of whether the sample is a 'Dorian' or not it's obviously a Greek.
>is from a Greek colony
>clusters with Aegean Greeks and South Italians (consistent with the Mycenaean pattern)
>it's not a Greek!!
You better accept it is already, because other samples are going to be much more 'shitskin' than this according to what Davidski said (that Classical Greeks were like Mycenaeans but with additional Anatolian input).

>>17834097
It's basically saying the same thing as the paper about the Balkans. That there was no significant genetic contribution from 'Italics'. This is because the Romans weren't pure Italics. There's a much stronger correlation between Roman expansion and J2 y-dna than there is with R1b-U152.
>Another possibility is that individuals carrying contributions from the Near East, which began increasing in S Europe during the Iron Age, might have migrated eastward in subsequent generations. As they share high-level similarity into eastern populations, they resulted in less pronounced differences in Anatolia.
>mudhutters
It's true.
>cuckolds
Their Celtic brothers sure were: https://www.livescience.com/archaeology/were-the-celts-matriarchal-ancient-dna-reveals-men-married-into-local-powerful-female-lineages