Search Results
7/6/2025, 1:25:49 AM
>>40295407
Body dysmorphia is real so race dysmorphia is real. Race is a combination of physical attributes.
>>40295388
You don't know how much people suffer from race dysphoria or gender dysphoria in general. All you know is that your experience is bad and it seems uncurable. Others may cure their race dysphoria and you wouldn't know. Others may still feel dysphoric despite transitioning and you wouldn't know. Your thread is stupid emotional conjecture.
Also for the lols there are people prettier than you who suffer over their looks and are more depressed than you.
Again there are people who are prettier than you who suffer way more than you and kill themselves.
Body dysmorphia is real so race dysmorphia is real. Race is a combination of physical attributes.
>>40295388
You don't know how much people suffer from race dysphoria or gender dysphoria in general. All you know is that your experience is bad and it seems uncurable. Others may cure their race dysphoria and you wouldn't know. Others may still feel dysphoric despite transitioning and you wouldn't know. Your thread is stupid emotional conjecture.
Also for the lols there are people prettier than you who suffer over their looks and are more depressed than you.
Again there are people who are prettier than you who suffer way more than you and kill themselves.
6/29/2025, 9:02:42 PM
>>81658923
The point of me bringing up that you can replace the ceo with someone morally good is to show how little power any individual has over issues (competing interests, capitalism, human greed) that have gotten out of hand. So when anon says there are a group of individuals who decide how bad the world is because they are evil. They is a misnomer. It's not that 1% of the population is evil that the world is in a bad place, it's that 98% of the world is. I don't see then why you'd point out that 1% of the world is evil to defend anon's worldview that they do as much damage as the 98%. ? It seems like shoehorning in wanting to talk about archetypes which is fine. We are in MBTI afterall. But it doesn't help us.
The point of me bringing up that you can replace the ceo with someone morally good is to show how little power any individual has over issues (competing interests, capitalism, human greed) that have gotten out of hand. So when anon says there are a group of individuals who decide how bad the world is because they are evil. They is a misnomer. It's not that 1% of the population is evil that the world is in a bad place, it's that 98% of the world is. I don't see then why you'd point out that 1% of the world is evil to defend anon's worldview that they do as much damage as the 98%. ? It seems like shoehorning in wanting to talk about archetypes which is fine. We are in MBTI afterall. But it doesn't help us.
Page 1