>>64012729
>Oh yeah I'm sure. Was he another one of your VANK coworkers?
Does pic related show up in your dreams recently?
>KF-21 in production has only some A/A capabilities
Already debunked by the existence of KGGB and other guided bombing methods. But I'd say it's lacking more in the variety of its armament.
>Anon, do you know the meaning of the words you're using? You literally just admitted my point.
How?
>I hate AI with passion, but the images posted by that anon earlier about you are pretty spot on.
?
>You can only post out of context articles that either prove nothing or go against your own talking points, when you're made aware of that you move the goalpost or simply ignore it and try to gaslight us with more baseless claims. I don't know how you are taught in south korea, but in the rest of the world people aren't so easily fooled by such a low effort shilling.
I've been telling you the truth all along though? At what point did my word made thou upset precisely? Is it because KF-21 will be one of the best selling fighters in its class?

>>64011552
>VANK
How many Koreans do you hate living rent free in your head?