>>714802712
They changed for a lot of weird liability reasons

>Make anime with adult woman in skimpy clothing
>Japanese regulations censor it because if its an adult woman she should have pubes there
>Even if not shown censorship guidelines dictate it because its an adult woman
>Safer (legally) just to draw girls 16 and under.
>Animations gradually go to younger and younger girls
>Japan is now a nation that exports loli/pedophilia adjacent content

Great Teacher Onizuka the live action version had a huge controversy back in the day because in one scene the teacher might have had a pubic hair showing during a scene where she was almost raped. It was unknown at the time if it was just a hair from her head on her panties but it was enough of a shit your pants moment for television to only depict non adults in those situations lol

Mental illness but as a country. Ised to be cool up untill the 00s, thrn something hsppened. It's like watching someone succumb to a incredible neurodegenerative disease.

>>714312232
UT3
I mean it wasn't actually bad, but wasn't as complete as UT2004. We all wanted a next gen 2004. The hype died after that, and every other schmuck made Quake clones, and Quake kinda sucks balls compared to what the genre could be.