Search Results
7/10/2025, 6:57:42 PM
>>17830368
The Council of Nicaea in 325 AD settled theological disputes, not wrote the Bible from scratch. The canon evolved over centuries, it wasn't settled in a single day.
>Constantine’s “non-conversion”
He delayed baptism till his deathbed in 337 AD, a common practice back then to wash away sins.
The Council of Nicaea in 325 AD settled theological disputes, not wrote the Bible from scratch. The canon evolved over centuries, it wasn't settled in a single day.
>Constantine’s “non-conversion”
He delayed baptism till his deathbed in 337 AD, a common practice back then to wash away sins.
6/15/2025, 8:31:21 PM
>>17766362
>Trajan explicitly refutes your jew narrative and is a primary source.
You’re referring to Pliny the Younger’s letter to Trajan, not Trajan himself. And that document confirms early Christianity wasn’t spread by force. Pliny reports that Christians are everywhere (rural, urban, rich, poor) and that the temples are being abandoned without violence. He asks if he should keep killing them just for refusing to sacrifice. Trajan says no need for witch hunts. So thanks for proving my point, I guess.
>Christianity took over Rome because of its populist nature. Time and again Rome gets taken over by populism.
Sure. Christianity offered hope to slaves, women, the poor, and those left cold by pagan fatalism. That’s not a refutation. If anything, it's a reason it succeeded. But calling it "populism" doesn’t make it false. Truth doesn’t care if it appeals to the masses or the elite. It just is.
>the crackhead mother tossing her stillborn baby into the dumpster
That’s exactly the kind of soul Christianity says can be redeemed. Paganism might scorn her. Christ dies for her too. Not because He excuses evil, but because He calls sinners back from it. You want a faith that only serves the “noble”? Then you want a tribal cult. Not a religion with the power to transform.
>your ugly jewish god is a reflection of your rotten kike soul
kek
>Augustine... poisoned by jewish slave morality
Augustine was a Roman rhetor, a Neoplatonist philosopher, and one of the sharpest minds of Late Antiquity. He didn’t fail to start a Renaissance. He preserved civilization during its collapse. You read Nietzsche and think he BTFO’d Augustine. Augustine read Cicero, Plato, and the Psalms and saw the soul’s drama laid bare.
But please, go on and tell me how Odin would’ve handled the sack of Rome.
>Trajan explicitly refutes your jew narrative and is a primary source.
You’re referring to Pliny the Younger’s letter to Trajan, not Trajan himself. And that document confirms early Christianity wasn’t spread by force. Pliny reports that Christians are everywhere (rural, urban, rich, poor) and that the temples are being abandoned without violence. He asks if he should keep killing them just for refusing to sacrifice. Trajan says no need for witch hunts. So thanks for proving my point, I guess.
>Christianity took over Rome because of its populist nature. Time and again Rome gets taken over by populism.
Sure. Christianity offered hope to slaves, women, the poor, and those left cold by pagan fatalism. That’s not a refutation. If anything, it's a reason it succeeded. But calling it "populism" doesn’t make it false. Truth doesn’t care if it appeals to the masses or the elite. It just is.
>the crackhead mother tossing her stillborn baby into the dumpster
That’s exactly the kind of soul Christianity says can be redeemed. Paganism might scorn her. Christ dies for her too. Not because He excuses evil, but because He calls sinners back from it. You want a faith that only serves the “noble”? Then you want a tribal cult. Not a religion with the power to transform.
>your ugly jewish god is a reflection of your rotten kike soul
kek
>Augustine... poisoned by jewish slave morality
Augustine was a Roman rhetor, a Neoplatonist philosopher, and one of the sharpest minds of Late Antiquity. He didn’t fail to start a Renaissance. He preserved civilization during its collapse. You read Nietzsche and think he BTFO’d Augustine. Augustine read Cicero, Plato, and the Psalms and saw the soul’s drama laid bare.
But please, go on and tell me how Odin would’ve handled the sack of Rome.
6/14/2025, 8:21:08 PM
>Due Process clause
>applied to divine providence
>on 4chan
kek
You're projecting modern liberal legal categories onto metaphysics. God is not a bureaucratic administrator beholden to an Enlightenment-era constitution. He's the Creator, not a judge in your imagined cosmic courtroom.
>one shot and one only
Yes. One life. But you're assuming life is a neutral game where fairness means equality of outcomes. That’s Enlightenment nonsense. Christianity never promised fairness in this world. It promises justice in the next. Temporal inequalities are a test, not a final judgment. Some carry heavier crosses. So what? Christ Himself suffered humiliation, torture, and death. Was that unjust? By your standard, yes. But by God's? It was salvific.
>"Humiliates innocent souls"
No one is born “innocent” in the full theological sense. We inherit original sin. Grace is a gift, not a right. If someone is born with burdens, that doesn’t mean God is punishing them. It means they’ve been entrusted with a greater trial. And often, those who suffer most on earth are first in heaven.
The problem isn’t with Christianity. It’s with your assumptions about what God owes you. He owes us nothing. That He offers anything (life, grace, redemption) is already mercy beyond measure.
>applied to divine providence
>on 4chan
kek
You're projecting modern liberal legal categories onto metaphysics. God is not a bureaucratic administrator beholden to an Enlightenment-era constitution. He's the Creator, not a judge in your imagined cosmic courtroom.
>one shot and one only
Yes. One life. But you're assuming life is a neutral game where fairness means equality of outcomes. That’s Enlightenment nonsense. Christianity never promised fairness in this world. It promises justice in the next. Temporal inequalities are a test, not a final judgment. Some carry heavier crosses. So what? Christ Himself suffered humiliation, torture, and death. Was that unjust? By your standard, yes. But by God's? It was salvific.
>"Humiliates innocent souls"
No one is born “innocent” in the full theological sense. We inherit original sin. Grace is a gift, not a right. If someone is born with burdens, that doesn’t mean God is punishing them. It means they’ve been entrusted with a greater trial. And often, those who suffer most on earth are first in heaven.
The problem isn’t with Christianity. It’s with your assumptions about what God owes you. He owes us nothing. That He offers anything (life, grace, redemption) is already mercy beyond measure.
6/12/2025, 5:51:14 PM
>>17757923
Let’s be clear: Christianity didn’t start with Constantine. It was already exploding underground, in catacombs, homes, and hearts, despite three centuries of brutal state suppression. Constantine recognized its momentum. He didn’t invent it. At best, he removed the boot from its neck. Also, he didn’t make it the official religion. That came later, under Theodosius. Constantine legalized it, gave it breathing room, and yes, gave bishops a seat at the table. That’s not nothing, but it’s a far cry from “Christianity was born from bloodshed.” The blood that built the Church came from its martyrs, not its enemies.
If anything, the Church’s struggle after Constantine was keeping its soul while gaining power. The faith that had conquered hearts now had to survive palaces. And that tension (between Christ crucified and Caesar crowned) has defined Christian history ever since.
Let’s be clear: Christianity didn’t start with Constantine. It was already exploding underground, in catacombs, homes, and hearts, despite three centuries of brutal state suppression. Constantine recognized its momentum. He didn’t invent it. At best, he removed the boot from its neck. Also, he didn’t make it the official religion. That came later, under Theodosius. Constantine legalized it, gave it breathing room, and yes, gave bishops a seat at the table. That’s not nothing, but it’s a far cry from “Christianity was born from bloodshed.” The blood that built the Church came from its martyrs, not its enemies.
If anything, the Church’s struggle after Constantine was keeping its soul while gaining power. The faith that had conquered hearts now had to survive palaces. And that tension (between Christ crucified and Caesar crowned) has defined Christian history ever since.
Page 1