>>510984127
Billions of taxpayer dollars have been stolen and wasted to support 50 years of failed research on controlled nuclear fusion experiments.
A good portion of this research is based on erroneous fundamental assumptions about how plasma and magnetic fields interact.
recently discovered inherent instabilities in the plasma that is generated by the process may make it impossible to control it and make it occur continuously.
Just to assume that such a sustained process is alive and well in the Sun’s core is a stretch.
A similar huge investment in astrophysics has produced little more than a cascade of whimsically named invisible entities, mysterious mechanisms, stories about magnetic bubbles, and other strange complexities, all case hardened in opaque mathematics.
If these fields had been more open to new ideas, they would have had better chances of achieving meaningful results.

>>510849822
The Egyptian god Atum bore a specific and strange characteristic.
He was honored as a sun of night.
>>510850485
no
>>510850498
>every god is saturn
There has never been any doubt that, as far as the Egyptians themselves were concerned, Atum was held to be one of the forms of the great Sun god Ra.
if Atum was honored as a sun of night, should we not expect that so, also, had been Ra?
This is exactly what we find. In a hymn, Ra is lauded as
>"the one alone ... lying awake while all men lie asleep."
And if some find that somewhat ambiguous, it is made clearer in the Egyptian Book of the Dead, where the god in question is unambiguously made to state:
>"I am that god Ra who shineth in the night."
Besides Atum and Ra, this sun of night was also anthropomorphosed by the Egyptians as the god Osiris.
Originally, Osiris is the nocturnal sun so are we now to assume that Osiris was also a personification of the planet Saturn?
Or how many Egyptian deities are we going to identify with this planet?
it was indicated that Atum should be considered the alter ego of a special aspect of Osiris.
Atum and Osiris are also sometimes amalgamated into one god, more frequently they are portrayed sitting back to back.
So that if Atum, as also Ra, is identifiable as the planet in question, then logic dictates that so must Osiris.

Here, perhaps, I could add that Ra was also worshipped by the same name in Mesopotamia, although his Semitic equivalent, EL, was more popular.
This should not surprise us. Far away in Tahiti, the sun god was also known by the name of Ra.
Thus, in Semitic, Babylon was rendered Bab-EL, which translates as "Gate of EL" The non-Semitic
Kassites, however, seem to have referred to the city as Ka-RA, in which "ra" stood for the
Semitic EL.
I mention this here because even in ancient times, EL (and, by extension, the Chaldean Ra) was known as a representative of the planet Saturn.

>>510226723
its actually very simple:
>Who were the real Aryan gods
Planets/Stars = Gods
>and who were the demons?
Planets/Stars = Gods but when they have flare up/Nova events or cause otherwise destructions.

>Zurvanism
In the Zoroastrian creation myth Zurvan was said to have provided, or emitted, the "original unformed matter", this is very interesting because, for one thing, the Iranian Zurvan was a very ancient deity.
He was regarded by the Zoroastrians as the "first principle," the "original seed," and "the father of the Cosmos." (gee where did I hear this before?)
But, more than that, this ancient deity had a well known identity.
In Armenian texts, Saturn is called Zruan which is the same as Zurvan.
The later worshippers of Mithra were not therefore wrong when they identified Kronos, the Greek Saturn, with Zurvan.
Actually, the identity of Zurvan as Saturn is well attested.

tl;dr Saturn worshippers
>Greeks, Latins, and Indian
also Saturnian Sun worshippers.

>>508646551
>the next week this person might tell this story to someone else
the reliability of oral tradition has been the subject of controversy since the time of Euhemerus, but we know from general anthropology and ancient literature that an exact rendition of a large body of verse and prose (such as Homers Iliad and other epic works) can be transmitted over generations and centuries.
ln the period of oral transmission, trained speakers could memorize and reproduce exactly thousands of lines heard from the lips of a teacher.

>>508471616
It was this "downward flow of light" from proto Saturn and its placental cloud which the ancients likened to the god's single leg and/or his penis.
In some instances, the god himself was considered to have been nothing more than the phallus of Creation.
Consequently, one of the meanings of the name of the Hindu Creator, "Prajapati", is the male organ of generation. More revealing is a passage in the Linga Purana which has been interpreted to mean that:
>"Pradhana, the primary unevolved matter, the cause of the universe is Linga itself. At the root of Linga the creator Brahma is stationed."
Here not only do we again find a reference to the placental cloud as the "un-evolved matter," but its direct association with the linga, that is phallus, as also with Brahma who (is also a personification of the Saturnian Sun) originated as an avatar of Saturn.
Curiously, in the "Bhagavata Purana", there is presented the image of a cosmic porpoise with the planet Saturn itself projected on its generative organ.
Of most importance is the fact that, in some cases, a phallus "sculptured in granite, marble, or ivory," which used to be kept "in the inmost recess, or sanctuary" of Hindu temples, was "surmounted by a golden star."
A similar colossal phallus was presented by Ptolemy Philadelphus to the temple of Osiris in Alexandria.

>>507650373
I support Iran's sovereignty to defend itself from psychotic yids.

I think school shootings should be viewed as externalized transgenderism where in addition to destroying themselves they destroy others as well.

>>507146554
Like that of other ancient nations, Hindu astronomy is inseparable from mythology.
This particular mythology, however, continues to thrive as the basis of Hindu religion.
In a way, it can therefore be said that, among the Hindus, planetary worship is practiced to this day and not only in an indirect way.
Here I would like to remind you of that passage from the "Linga Purana" which admonishes that:
>"the worship of the planets should be pursued by good men."
Moreover, the reason behind this admonition is the warding-off of evil at times of planetary "harassment."
in these modern times, not many practicing Hindus are even aware of these words, and few, if any, among them actually practice planetary worship, is besides the point.
Like the gods of other nations, Vedic deities are known by more than one name or epithet as so, also, are the planets.
Thus, one of the names for the Sun in Sanskrit is "Arka".
But then we find that three related designations for the planet Saturn in the same language are "Arki"; "Arka-putra" and "Arkatanayah".
Both "Arka-putra" and "Arkatanayah" translate as "son of the Sun."
Arkaja, which means "sun-born" can also be applied to the planet Saturn as so, also, can "Arkanandana".
So, once again, we find the planet Saturn bearing a name which is shared by the Sun

also strictly speaking, Brahma was not a Vedic deity. He more properly belongs to that corpus of Hindu lore known as Brahmanic mythology.
He was proclaimed the first of the Devas, usually said to mean "gods," but which properly translates as "shining ones".
Here it should be noted that the Sanskrit adjective "brahmanya" means "relating [or belonging] to Brahma.
Brahmanyah, however, is yet another epithet of the planet Saturn.

tl;dr Poojeets are also Saturn worshippers.