>>715967667
Controversy threads are paid marketing threads anon. Just like some Vtumor was caught larping as a hate to keep his Vtranny relevant but he forgot that chan had ids.
Shills get paid per thread, it doesn't matter if it's hater thread, like when Ubisoft pretends their games were leaked or Neil Cuckmann shills Tlou/his new globina game

>>715585129
Nintendo indians are losing catalogue space to shill Nintendo products, it's why you won't see let's say fromfags or capcomfags giving a shit about gacha but 8 gacha threads mean less space for Peach, Samus, Zelda poke furry threads, see
>>715600995
>>715594542
>>715578329
It's always the same hourly threads, but those threads die fast unless they samefag so instead of accepting people don't want to engage their childhood games they keep making threads as soon as the others die.
Then you have feminist western developers seething at chinks being smarter by making more money with less graphics just because of fanservice, and like 2 generation of women hitting the premenopause while the average man quit and is busy with games or any other hobby

>>715548890
>Please talk about Zelda