>>510092512
>I absolutely did answer you. You can claim "You didn't answer my question" when I did infact answer. I answered you directly and provided an example to equate your hypothetical
More question dodging from a cowardly Christian

I asked if God knows what you'll eat for dinner tomorrow, and you said
>God knows all possible options, yes
That's not what I asked you

I asked if he knows what you'll eat or not. Out of the infinity of time and space you will eat (or not eat) a meal tomorrow night for dinner. Does he know what that particular meal will be?

The fact that Christians can't answer this extremely simple question without dishonesty is remarkable

>>509872828
>God created man upright (ecclesiastes 7:29) and evil entered through rebellion, not design.
Evil entered man because man was made faulty. If man was made perfect evil could not have entered into him

>He created a perfect humanity capable of moral choice, because love, worship and obedience require freedom
Man and woman that fall to temptation, cursing all men and animals to death is not "perfect"

>the greater good is a world where evil, permitted but not auathored by God, is defeated through Christ
All evil is authored by God. See >>509872624

The Prime Mover knew all events that would ever occur before he created anything. He is the direct author of our reality. If you're brave enough to answer- does God know what you'll eat for dinner tomorrow?

>unless His purpose was to display BOTH justice and mercy (Romans 9:22-23) to glorify Himself not just in innocence, but in redemption
Torturing one's son to death as a form of vicarious redemption for the evil actions of other men is neither mercy nor justice. In fact punishing the innocent for the sins of the guilty is the opposite of justice

Not that men can truly be called guilty for doing exactly as their Creator knew they would

>>509873093
Evading the question