Search Results
!!Nfxx3kHaOiH/lgbt/40444871#40447312
7/20/2025, 7:10:07 PM
>>40447290
also this trvthnvke
also this trvthnvke
6/29/2025, 11:36:12 PM
>>81660720
I hate mowing. Good luck lol.
>>81660701
>now quantum duality and qualia
What people chase is subjective/pointless to argue because a human cannot be fully aware of all it's parts, and there are many takes on what seperates conscious/unconscious/intentional/unintentional. Just invoking personhood is a generalization. The conversation then is about what is the most functional generalization/neurological model. So what, you're assigning intentionality to quantum phenomenon in the brain? That doesn't contradict the idea that, whatever contradictions are the result of a more nuanced understanding a human, are not functional. You don't disagree with me, that any moral system that doesn't sort out those contradictions, is not functional. Do you have a model that legitimately excuses contradictive behavior as good or not.
Your examples only seem like confirmation to me.
I hate mowing. Good luck lol.
>>81660701
>now quantum duality and qualia
What people chase is subjective/pointless to argue because a human cannot be fully aware of all it's parts, and there are many takes on what seperates conscious/unconscious/intentional/unintentional. Just invoking personhood is a generalization. The conversation then is about what is the most functional generalization/neurological model. So what, you're assigning intentionality to quantum phenomenon in the brain? That doesn't contradict the idea that, whatever contradictions are the result of a more nuanced understanding a human, are not functional. You don't disagree with me, that any moral system that doesn't sort out those contradictions, is not functional. Do you have a model that legitimately excuses contradictive behavior as good or not.
Your examples only seem like confirmation to me.
6/24/2025, 5:11:18 PM
6/15/2025, 10:08:51 PM
>>40068146
Most of the mtfs here aren't looking for someone like you. They'd just call you a fag or chaser (slur) and not in a sadistic way. OP probably doesn't want you either btw, she wants something else and at hest would settle for you. Evidence-> >>40067938
>that isn’t a chaser anywhere to be honest
>>40068224
Other people aren't tools to validate your personal choices. The answer from that anon is irrelevant. He can't smooth out insecurities for you. Not forever. It has nothing to do with love, what you are describing is not love. It is a need for validation. If you want that stick to sex. It has nothing to do with what "all chasers want" either. That is a generalization that takes blame off yourself and puts it on chasers (slur).
Most of the mtfs here aren't looking for someone like you. They'd just call you a fag or chaser (slur) and not in a sadistic way. OP probably doesn't want you either btw, she wants something else and at hest would settle for you. Evidence-> >>40067938
>that isn’t a chaser anywhere to be honest
>>40068224
Other people aren't tools to validate your personal choices. The answer from that anon is irrelevant. He can't smooth out insecurities for you. Not forever. It has nothing to do with love, what you are describing is not love. It is a need for validation. If you want that stick to sex. It has nothing to do with what "all chasers want" either. That is a generalization that takes blame off yourself and puts it on chasers (slur).
Page 1