>>106009268
>i'm gonna become an anti-porn christfag to own the libs
>i'm gonna jerk more than usual to make the conservacucks seethe
When will this idpol retardation end?

>>715720498
>>715721098
Looking at a r*ddit thread about it and their ToS it seems like fansly were forced to ban a bunch of things because of (((payment processors))), anthro furry for start but also really tame stuff like smoking cigarettes. It's pretty bad because even if you don't care there are people for who it's an important source of income. I'm starting to think it's not about porn or morality but about destroying people's ability to make money autonomously, you can say just stay sfw but it's a fact that porn sells, and niche fetishes always have an audience.
They want you poor and destitute, because really what's a talented artist with entrepreneurship skills gonna do? Get hired by a big company that has been replacing their entire art direction team with AI?

>>212269904
>>well you just lack chan-literacy
don't know what OP has to do with you projecting your boylust onto women.

>>713815501
It's just e-celeb drama. If your internet daddy is mutahar, ross, or moist then you must spam the board with the useless petition and then accuse anyone making fun of it of having some WoW player as your e-daddy. This petition is just a proxy war that will continue regardless, better get used to this spam already.

>>60519595
>Jerome: "we need to look at the data"
>Reporter: "okay well the data on inflation looks good, why no bepis cut?"
>Jerome: "well you see, that may be data, but it's backwards facing data so we don't like that data. We're actually going based off feelings from the wise council of forecasters who definitely aren't emotional faggots"
Jerome should just come out and say that there's no more rate cuts until Blumpf is impeached. Sick of this gaslighting about "data".