>>17830773
> This goes for quite literally everything
Yes, that would be logic, which dialectics oppose by proposing everything inherently supposes its own opposite
>So the "you" is opposed by the "not you"
no retard, I'm trying to say the two have nothing inherently opposing each other
>My argument is that every contradiction is people being retarded
yes, that is my argument, in this case you being false in the contradiction instead of me being false or us being both false and being irrelevant to the topic at hand
>And what do you think influences will (hint : it might be their material context)
Their being in totality, not everything is material, neither is everything environmental, they exist on to themselves without opposition
and you avoided the question that if it's solely their individual wills that exist or not
>Collective wills is that group sharing the same material conditions
No, no such thing actually exists, this brutalization is purely to avoid a contradiction(falsehood) for retards who fail to account for every single and each person as they should.
This concept is to solely help them understand that better with the superficial similarities in between group members, as it would be extremely hard to categorize people to even the crude and half wrong extent that we barely manage to in the first place if we wouldn't stereotype after all
I suppose this ties to intersectionality as one's categorizations improve vastly in proportion to however smaller he makes the target group for the same reason as why group will doesn't really exist desu.
I have to individually regard each nigger as its own nigger to be correctly racist to the entire group of niggers for example. If i don't properly sociologially be racist, how will i look her in the eye

>>16716214
vaccines are good and should be continued.
unfortunately, they won't change the fact that you are still an obvious reddit faggot, desu.

what is your degree in anyway reddit faggot, tattling, desu?