>>714995952
absolutely retarded take. did you know art museums exhibit oftentimes design pieces? aka, literal products for daily use. furniture, tools, jewelry, anything you can think of
do you also think movies are products? all those boring nouvelle vague movies must be there for a practial purpose, right?
actually, even art pieces in the traditional sense are products too. the fucking sistine chapel was a commission, a product requested by the church to show their economical ant religious power
it's how said products are considered after, both outside and inside their related context, that makes art, as >>714994845 said
so, taking your example, og resident evil and silent hill have value in that they are an attempt (by japanese, game-developing people) to adapt the styles of certain directors (lynch, romero, kubrick) in a videogame format, which then built off their very own style regarding their platform (video games) and their own vision and plot narrative-wise. this could pretty easily be defined as art regardless of their value detached from that
remakes, thought? they definitely suit being a product. there is nothing behind their development beyond the developers remaking them, very lazily at that. just a cash grab.
if you'd keep consuming that kind of shit, no wonder you view videogames as mere functional products

>>714183296
>face is depicted to be under the age of 18

>>211487085
man. women are retarded.