>>212408235
Another example of based S-Kube rescuing a wonderful story from an author who doesn't understand it

What're the odds that during the making of "the shining" S. Kubrick just did random things under the guise of "symbolism" and whatnot? So that it'll seem like his movie was deep & that people'll keep arguing over the plot for years to come?

Why do schizos love his movies so much?