Simple as

>>715214824
Lmao basically

Art grants going to videogames has not served to better the medium, but instead served as a hipster welfare program for untalented hacks to shit out propaganda.
>But if Videogames aren't art how do you justify preservation?
They are history. History is entitled to preservation.
>But everything is art
If everything is art, nothing is art.
>but videogames cause human emotions
So does working as a customer care rep and being frustrated with an assembly instruction manual. Doesn't make it art.
>Are you saying the art in games isn't art?
Games contain art, just like a deck of cards has art. However just cause it has art does not make it art.
>I don't care what you say they are art
Cool, you disagree, doesn't make it art
>They're art but you shouldn't treat them as art cause it makes them worse overall
You and I disagree just slightly and I can respect your different opinion because we still reach the same conclusion.

>>714132379
Yes, amazing videogames paid for by taxpayers like DUSTBORN are very much art and videogames are sooooooo much better for this designation

>>713052007
DUSTBORN is what you get when you try and make a game to show videogames are art