Search Results
7/20/2025, 7:21:49 PM
>"Hey, Anon! Here are the tools to make your own dedicated and master servers. While you're at it, here's the source code to my engine. Cheers!"
7/19/2025, 3:26:39 PM
>"Hey, Anon, here are the tools for you to host your own Quake or Doom server. While you're at it, here's the source code for the engine too. Have fun!"
7/19/2025, 3:58:34 AM
Post yfw Europe will save gaming in our lifetime
7/7/2025, 6:44:02 PM
sport bikes are very fun but very dangerous.
the principal problems are the following:
1. bikes are slower to stop (very limited decceleration due to low weight)
2. bikes cannot manouvre independently of their position on the road
the second one gets a lot of people. in order to turn left, you must first drive over a section of road to your right. this is required in order to put your centre of mass in the correct place to compensate for the turning moment induced by centripetal forces of the turn.
ofcourse, what happens if theres something there already? well, youre a bit screwed. You can shift your mass to the left with your bum, and it will induce a turn from a straight line, but because your mass is small relative to the bike, the radius of the turn will not be great, and you will probably not turn quickly enough.
a car is objectively *more* maneouverable and agile than a motorbike. this is very unintuitive, but is true, and i believe this discrepancy exists because people confuse the relatively small footprint occupied by the bike (thus making the road feel "big") versus that of a car.
riding a bike requires significantly more concentration, and risk taking. it is impossible to ride a bike with the same risk level as a car because again, you are less maneouvrable than the cars around you
(except in one dimension: acceleration. infact, that should be your principal "get out of emergency" tool: open the throttle. for this reason I believe low-hp bikes to be legitimately dangerous, because they lose out on the one hail-mary that bikes can allow themselves.)
the principal problems are the following:
1. bikes are slower to stop (very limited decceleration due to low weight)
2. bikes cannot manouvre independently of their position on the road
the second one gets a lot of people. in order to turn left, you must first drive over a section of road to your right. this is required in order to put your centre of mass in the correct place to compensate for the turning moment induced by centripetal forces of the turn.
ofcourse, what happens if theres something there already? well, youre a bit screwed. You can shift your mass to the left with your bum, and it will induce a turn from a straight line, but because your mass is small relative to the bike, the radius of the turn will not be great, and you will probably not turn quickly enough.
a car is objectively *more* maneouverable and agile than a motorbike. this is very unintuitive, but is true, and i believe this discrepancy exists because people confuse the relatively small footprint occupied by the bike (thus making the road feel "big") versus that of a car.
riding a bike requires significantly more concentration, and risk taking. it is impossible to ride a bike with the same risk level as a car because again, you are less maneouvrable than the cars around you
(except in one dimension: acceleration. infact, that should be your principal "get out of emergency" tool: open the throttle. for this reason I believe low-hp bikes to be legitimately dangerous, because they lose out on the one hail-mary that bikes can allow themselves.)
7/7/2025, 5:31:29 PM
>>714772570
Ok, now lets see your CAD software, lets see your photoshop, lets see your video editing software
Oh what's that, you don't have any and you still have to buy a separate device just to do all those things? Tough shit lmao
Ok, now lets see your CAD software, lets see your photoshop, lets see your video editing software
Oh what's that, you don't have any and you still have to buy a separate device just to do all those things? Tough shit lmao
6/19/2025, 12:44:07 PM
Page 1