>>512887851
I never said Tummo or Wim Hof don't exist, I said they don't prove reincarnation or souls

You're mixing up controlling body temperature with proving anything beyond biology.

>>512856252
You're welcome but I only use Papago translator

You're welcome but I only use Papago translator

>>512773826
Ha... Let me try again for the slow ones

Over 50% of America's farmworkers are undocumented. In states like California, it's closer to 75%. Remove them and your produce section turns into a luxury boutique overnight. Meatpacking? Same story. Construction? Forget it, your housing crisis will triple in a year.

In shory, You'll be living in a cardboard box bragging about how you "HAHA we saved America from illegals. REEEEEE!!"

>>512289641
Honestly the most shocking part of 9/11 isn't the hijacking itself, but the fact that FOUR planes were hijacked and flying toward major cities for over an hour… and the US just sat there.

If this were China, they would've launched missiles and shot them down before a single tower got scratched

>>512216873
Bro, that's pure COPE.

You can't rewrite 1616 and 1633 like it's fanfiction. The Church literally declared heliocentrism 'formally heretical' not just because of tone or insults, but because it contradicted Scripture. That's not 'censoring personal attacks'. That's suppressing science with theology.

>In 1616 the Inquisition declared heliocentrism to be both scientifically indefensible and heretical
>found "vehemently suspect of heresy" for following the position of Copernicus, which is contrary to the true sense and authority of Holy Scripture
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_affair

Galileo was banned from teaching it, Copernicus's De revolutionibus was censored, and even Kepler's work got banned despite Kepler being a devout Christian. If this was just about Galileo being rude, why did Kepler's Epitome get yeeted too?

Because science ≠ doctrine back then (that is a symbol, might not show up properly here), and the Church didn't like being contradicted.