>>106117361
what's even weirder is that even if I factor in deliberate bad faith arguing, people trying to be purposely obtuse, etc., it really shouldn't be difficult getting actual info because again, shit's hard science, you know like how the number 2 is larger than the number 1 and nobody debates that
with actual comparisons and citations it should be plain as day to see which tech is actually superior based on what you're looking for but it's like this board is verging on /x/ levels of being incomprehensible