>>718296505
the ISS is a hoax and it's just military planes that sell you the lie
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XetG30_YOeo

there is no little station flying around earth at 18000mph among ten thousand other satellites lol. thats just a lie they told you that you believe because they can point to a thing to the sky and say "see, this proves the whole story about its distance and speed and what it is!" pic related is not reality

>>509170356
the deepest we've ever been in the ocean is only 6 miles, so either earth is tiny and the ocean floor is not that deep, or they are lying to you about how much of earth they've truly explored

>>509170437
do you think a piece of paper makes you accredited? do you think having your diploma means you can't be wrong? do you think it means the science you've been taught can't be speculative?

newton didn't even believe in gravity, the cavendish experiment is falsifiable, it sounds like you were taught some propaganda in 10th grade science class and now you've internalized it. do you think matter can interact with matter across a vast distance with zero background medium? let me reiterate, NEWTON DID NOT EVEN BELIEVE IN GRAVITY LOL! not to mention it's been rewritten entirely since then, now it's the bending and warping of space time.

here's a question to you since you have a degree: how come i can ADD MASS to a balloon (via helium) and it will FLOAT? with MORE MASS, what happens to gravity? how come it's not pulling down on the balloon which is heavier now?

second example: the internet and my computer did not need "quantum mechanics" to operate. to say that "well, we have technology, so all the technology they've ever posited is legitimate" is not intellectually honest

third example: i dont deny we have a sophisticated relay of equipment up in the air, suspended on helium balloons. NASA is the #1 purchaser of over 95% of the worlds helium. do you think the only way you could get wireless internet is with over ten thousand satellites in "orbit" at 17500 mph? have you ever seen a satellite for yourself? you are invoking a technology that neither of us have ever seen, and saying its responsible for the "GPS systems". why dont you look up how much of our internet is done via underwater cables on earth? oh yeah, over 99% of it. so you're telling me we have ten thousand satellites around earth.. doing what exactly?

>>22884192
the deepest we've ever been in the ocean is only 6 miles, so either earth is tiny and the ocean floor is not that deep, or they are lying to you about how much of earth they've truly explored

>>22884193
do you think a piece of paper makes you accredited? do you think having your diploma means you can't be wrong? do you think it means the science you've been taught can't be speculative?

newton didn't even believe in gravity, the cavendish experiment is falsifiable, it sounds like you were taught some propaganda in 10th grade science class and now you've internalized it. do you think matter can interact with matter across a vast distance with zero background medium? let me reiterate, NEWTON DID NOT EVEN BELIEVE IN GRAVITY LOL! not to mention it's been rewritten entirely since then, now it's the bending and warping of space time.

here's a question to you since you have a degree: how come i can ADD MASS to a balloon (via helium) and it will FLOAT? with MORE MASS, what happens to gravity? how come it's not pulling down on the balloon which is heavier now?

second example: the internet and my computer did not need "quantum mechanics" to operate. to say that "well, we have technology, so all the technology they've ever posited is legitimate" is not intellectually honest

third example: i dont deny we have a sophisticated relay of equipment up in the air, suspended on helium balloons. NASA is the #1 purchaser of over 95% of the worlds helium. do you think the only way you could get wireless internet is with over ten thousand satellites in "orbit" at 17500 mph? have you ever seen a satellite for yourself? you are invoking a technology that neither of us have ever seen, and saying its responsible for the "GPS systems". why dont you look up how much of our internet is done via underwater cables on earth? oh yeah, over 99% of it. so you're telling me we have ten thousand satellites around earth.. doing what exactly?

>>507299236
there is no such thing as "satellites" or "outer space", why don't you go ahead and post a real image of one you found from google? oh wait, it's all computer renders just like your opening pic

the idea of over ten thousand satellites freefalling at 17,500 mph while earth is freefalling at 500,000 mph through space is so absurd that if any of you genuinely tried to imagine it (if your brains are capable) then you would immediately understand how fucking nonsense and stupid it is

does anyone here SERIOUSLY believe pic related is reality and what is happening 24/7 all the time while the earth is allegedly flying through outer space?

btw op nice photoshopped curved globe in the background