Search results for "0a4cbd8124073e43fbf9242c078cf002" in md5 (2)

/tv/ - Thread 213634483
Anonymous No.213636555
>>213635872
There's basically two types of evidence you can collect from a photo / film.
1. Subjective
2. Objective

Subjective evidence isn't the best type of evidence, because it's open to interpretation. The "good suit" seen by one person may not be a "good suit" to another due to a variety of factors. While subjective evidence isn't the best kind of evidence, it is still evidence.

Objective evidence is subject to measurement, not opinion. It is the best type of evidence, and when paired with subjective evidence, is pretty much conclusive. There are measurements that can be made from the PGF that should 100% prove that the subject is simply a man in a costume, but none of those measurements support that theory.
1. Arm length doesn't match a guy in a suit.
2. Forearm length doesn't match a guy in a suit using arm extensions to make the arms look longer.
3. Angle by the trail foot doesn't match foot angles of a guy in a suit.
4. Lower leg angle doesn't match the angles of a guy in a suit.
5. Extended leg angle doesn't match a guy in a suit.

None of the measurable objective evidence supports a costume theory, and when combined with the subjective evidence, pretty much conclusively demonstrates that the PGF isn't a guy in a suite.
/tv/ - Found Footage -The Making of the Patterson Project.2025.1080p.WEB-DL.DD+5.1.H.264
Anonymous No.212177455
>>212169558
>the proportions and gate are not replicable

The way the thing walks and the foot and leg angles are what finally sold me. People don't make those kind of angles when they walk, and peoples arms are shorter than their legs, but that's not the case with the PGF.