>>127431137
I thought this would be exceedingly dry performances, which is probably the number one quality I hate the most, but I'm actually liking it so far

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nuZ3DaaPZyE&list=OLAK5uy_m_afPa6Mlu26qm3BjKrYKKDCFhkrLRxAo&index=18

plus the other cycles I've listened to recently have all had slower tempos, so some change in that with a faster, more traditional approach should be good