>>33817828
>what is sexual compatibility
anyway, doesn't matter
the important fact is that OP's man is not a well-adjusted healthy smart male, those try sex before marriage. hence OP is taking a risk disclosing this fact.

>>33608639
whats in it for him? you get the marriage and appearances.
he gets... what? a sexless marriage? or is he gay? or has some other thing to hide?

>>33281693
>genetic survival for all
oh god please no
medical progress already causes the human race to stagnate/degenerate a lot
we don't need more intrinsically crippled people reproducing. thanks.