>>718857013
lol
4chan Search
11 results for "11c3409d9ac6d7d2b3b6394d13ce8ea8"
>>718780479
Neither is owning a bar and yet plenty of rich people own them for clout and pussy. It's really infantile, or rather teenager-like to think that money is the sole means for power, it's just one avenue for it, it's the most low-caste one too. Imagine being so cool that everybody obeys you and give lodging and serve you food and follow your plan, that's kinda like Darth Vader in Star Wars. Why would he need credits? He just shows up and immediately gets a meeting with the top admiral and everybody has to do what he says. People are trying to get that level of influence.
Neither is owning a bar and yet plenty of rich people own them for clout and pussy. It's really infantile, or rather teenager-like to think that money is the sole means for power, it's just one avenue for it, it's the most low-caste one too. Imagine being so cool that everybody obeys you and give lodging and serve you food and follow your plan, that's kinda like Darth Vader in Star Wars. Why would he need credits? He just shows up and immediately gets a meeting with the top admiral and everybody has to do what he says. People are trying to get that level of influence.
>>717835137
Normal people "non-woke" people are charitable and will give them a chance and hire them while the wokies will not.
Remember it's legal to hire only women but illegal to hire only men. How can you build anything with these laws? Let alone video games.
Let's say I go and say that I will not hire women or homosexuals as a CEO. Suddenly that's supposedly controversial and then I get attacked and sued and whatnot, meanwhile you can find a bunch of examples of women saying outright that they want to dismantle the "boys club" ergo replace men with women, as in they will not hire normal heterosexual men and we've not done anything against that vileness, why? We wanted to give them a chance? Do you take the chance to eat the poisoned apple, again?
So far they have completely won in the corporate world, but luckily their enforcement tactics of nagging and threatening you to lose your job doesn't work for the consumer, they just lose interest and it ends up sabotaging the industry. By all accounts every gamers should be spending at least $800 per year in video games, yet we buy 1-2 games per year instead and most likely those are old games, spending about 1/5 of what we would if we were actually excited for what is coming out. But these HR cunts keep failing upwards, as if sabotaging the industry was the actual goal.
Normal people "non-woke" people are charitable and will give them a chance and hire them while the wokies will not.
Remember it's legal to hire only women but illegal to hire only men. How can you build anything with these laws? Let alone video games.
Let's say I go and say that I will not hire women or homosexuals as a CEO. Suddenly that's supposedly controversial and then I get attacked and sued and whatnot, meanwhile you can find a bunch of examples of women saying outright that they want to dismantle the "boys club" ergo replace men with women, as in they will not hire normal heterosexual men and we've not done anything against that vileness, why? We wanted to give them a chance? Do you take the chance to eat the poisoned apple, again?
So far they have completely won in the corporate world, but luckily their enforcement tactics of nagging and threatening you to lose your job doesn't work for the consumer, they just lose interest and it ends up sabotaging the industry. By all accounts every gamers should be spending at least $800 per year in video games, yet we buy 1-2 games per year instead and most likely those are old games, spending about 1/5 of what we would if we were actually excited for what is coming out. But these HR cunts keep failing upwards, as if sabotaging the industry was the actual goal.
>>717336294
Imagine if a 10 trillion game like GTA6 gets cancelled by payment processors, that would be so fucking based.
Fuck them banning small devs who then just die and nobody even care, I want to see it for a big dev and see what happens in real time.
Imagine if a 10 trillion game like GTA6 gets cancelled by payment processors, that would be so fucking based.
Fuck them banning small devs who then just die and nobody even care, I want to see it for a big dev and see what happens in real time.
>>716424779
In other words: Yasukes will no longer be marketed. But they'll still be prominent in the actual product.
In other words: Yasukes will no longer be marketed. But they'll still be prominent in the actual product.
>>714203137
western games are still gay and cringe and shall remain so because the AIDS and competency rot has purged the system
western games are still gay and cringe and shall remain so because the AIDS and competency rot has purged the system
>>713101571
You missed the patch notes
You missed the patch notes
>>712420556
Silly corporate cuck
Silly corporate cuck