>>719047451
>Why is it so bad bros?
It's honestly not bad, it's pretty fun, but it has (had? idk if they fixed it) performance issues on PC, and doesn't really do anything better than DDDA and is more of a remake than a sequel.
It could still be GOAT'd if it gets an expansion as good as Dark Arisen, but it's highly unlikely.

>>718028164
>every standard
>sales, in reviews and in fan reception
popularity - i.e. the standards of women and fags
the only standards that matter are game design quality
and since DD2 is objectively better than DD1 in gameplay and exploration, then DD2 is objectively a good game