>>512706434
>>512706558
After takeoff the plane travels at level flight and its pitch does not change for two hours before the plane got into difficulties. Travelling at around 500mph for two hours, the plane would be required to drop 128 miles (677,824 feet) to match the claimed earth curvature. This means the plane would be required to constantly pitch down and drop an average 5,645 feet per minute, which does not happen as proven by the flight data.

>>23086331
>>23086333
After takeoff the plane travels at level flight and its pitch does not change for two hours before the plane got into difficulties. Travelling at around 500mph for two hours, the plane would be required to drop 128 miles (677,824 feet) to match the claimed earth curvature. This means the plane would be required to constantly pitch down and drop an average 5,645 feet per minute, which does not happen as proven by the flight data.

>>507107882
You really need to check the def of AoA...
It's different than flight angle/pitch...
It's a function between the flight angle and the trajectory...
Your take is not right because the AC is seen from take off up to when it crashes to maintain about the same attitude/pitch, while the AoA augmented overtime, prompting a stall...
That's why after take-off he climb, "stabilize* then fall, in a "ballistic" manner while still maintaining tâbout the same flight angle/pitch...
It's just that the AoA augmented overtime once again due to low speed...
See picrel to update your understanding of AoA please...
I understand what you mean but the way you frame it is misleading due to wrong usage of the AoA term...

As fr the RAT from every videos seen, it didn't dropped, if you have a video link to post with a timestamps that would be great please, because I didn't see any RAT from any vids so far...

Dual engine failure might be a possibility but from what we can see it is perhaps on of the least probable causes. even if technically possible though... but by order of importance, it would get ranked near the last ones...