>>507506345
It's not the same thing, we don't have a mutual border so airpower is the only thing that matter. Without missiles or launchers to shoot them they won't be able to fight.
>>507506417
I think there's going to be another wave later on, but that's not the point. The first attacks months ago had hundreds of missiles, two days ago it was down to a hundred, now it's dozens.. The only excuse for this is keeping their ammunition tight so they'll be able to stand against us for weeks, but at the price of their attacks becoming more vulnerable to interception.
>>507506420
>TELs
How much do you think they have? Can missiles be launched without them on some homemade platform?
>>507506606
No, you need.. sorry, you MUST intercept them for me. You only exist to benefit me, never forget that goy.