Bumping for ufos

>>509577810
You would be very, very surprised. Pic related is why you will probably never see any meaningful disclosure unless the Chinese develop the same capability.

The most well documented (((UAP))) sighting you have never heard about.

>>507987338
Funny you should mention this, because this is exactly what I believe they are going to do. Trump is going to Zap them like we did to the Norks at Ryanggang in 2005. He can't shut the fuck up about "muh superweapon", and they certainly aren't going to drop a B-61 Mod 13 on it. A collimated beam of bound state positronium will certainly ruin their day.

>>507728476
He's going to Zap them, isn't he? He keeps mentioning it. It won't be a warhead, it will be a collimated beam of bound state positronium.