>>17972422
>you can call your PoWs "disarmed enemy forces" and just like that, the Geneva Convention on Prisoners of War no longer applies
You're right, now you're just mistreating soldiers that are hors de combat by your own definitions, which is also against conventions of warfare and in some cases is treated more severely that just mistreating POWs, retard.
>Tell me more about international law and how it's totally real
>>17972428
>International law is imposed by those it benefits
You retards are both missing the point. Conventions of warfare are made to benefit both parties, if one side violates these conventions this opens up the possibility that the other side will treat your own men like shit as well.
