>>513686597
Okay so I want to respond harshly to you with insults but I'm just going to request you go ahead and demonstrate your claim with an example, at least one instance of someone such as yourself or anyone else, who "knows" and "understands" something they did not study.
Actually, I'll do you a favor and argue your claim for you:
I think what you're saying could be true for martial arts, one could know and understand fighting without having formally studied it or even trained for it. I believe this is demonstrated when animals and people manage to fight off attackers effectively even though they never "studied".
As for critical thinking, people do apply logic without knowing the names of the various fallacies, and often use deduction and induction.
Who are you calling a Midwit btw yourself or me? I take it that you're describing yourself as the King Midwit right or did I misunderstand your post?