>>40759028
>Lao-tse’s position was not that truth was incommunicable, or that words were completely useless (otherwise he would never have written his book), but rather that unless words are supplemented essentially by communication through the trans- onscious mind, no true understanding or enlightenment will develop, nor will the highest truths be understood. His later Ch’an and Zen followers in intellectualistic arrogance often derided words and language completely, revealing their self-contradiction in their voluminous writings and incessant speaking about what Zen “really means.”’
>Lao-tse specifically mentions a Tao that can be named which is efficacious in nature as well as one that cannot be named and which is even more efficacious, but which also can be understood by use of unconscious and transconscious processes of the mind, which are independent of the ordinary discursive use of words.