>>61274131
>they’d need an entirely different approach if they want to solve that issue
But they could just do that tho.
Humans have built other things in the past that by comparison where probably as insane sounding as this stuff is today and we never let anything stop us from making it happen out of pure spite.
The idea you are asserting is that this technology cant evolve over time. The entire past 200+ years is more than enough proof you are wrong. If you REALLY think AI will just become and stay stagnant then post stuff backing up your ideas. Show articles talking about stagnation or people coming to the ends of their means as far as getting AI to not be shit. if this is all a smoke screen then it should be easy enough for you to find what I am talking about. INB4 "do it yourself faggot!"
If you cant be bothered to back up what you say then no one is going to take what you are saying seriously.

>>213581323
>Maybe in relation to his costars, but he was a decent at best guy in competitions
Nah He was really good.
>literally ran a mall dojo.
You can just say you have no idea what he actually taught man its ok. If you had any idea what he was teaching you would know this was not true even in the slightest lol.

There is a tendie mod on /v/ who will straight up ban you for criticizing Nintendo lol. /tv/ isn't THAT bad

>Blade's gallery entry
>I ended up sleepin' off my wounds in "space Wakanda" for what felt like months

>>149416752
>chelshit
>buying low