>>41286233
only Hermes was an "Angel" in the sense christcucks think of them.
ALL divine things are "gods", but abrahamics try to just lump them all together into one entity, like its some dictatorship up there or something, and a democracy down here and we can voote to choose our gods up there. its retarded.
and imo its not fixable. even back then there was a spiritual ceiling, only so many abstractions could be conceived of before normies/jews began to insert themselves, completely oblivious to what its about, who sought to mar the practice and exploit it for their own greed. and when they tried to actually learn, they found themselves way less capable than those before them and drove themselves insane in the process of trying to reconcile the gods irl with exploiting them to their own benefit and reaffirm their own chosenness. gee, i wonder why. with 2000 years of this being completely neglected, youve seen spiritual devolvement, so people trying today would probably be even less capable than people back then. and i doubt gayI will be able to bail them out. theyre more likely to reproduce the process themselves before ever figuring out its the process above.
its a systems/world building formula, necessary for any 'creator' to tackle: how to create the preconditions necessary to bring about one's own creation. and the answer is, it cant be done individually. there must always be a second aspect, minimum. but beyond that initial problem there a near infinite number of other prerequisites, which require solving. perfecting. so 'gods' early on were on these concepts. they had little backstories and names to try to help people conceptualize their having been incorporated and addressed previously. then you see it just goes off the rails, everything devolves, rape babies, abortion survivor baby demiurges. they lose the plot.
4chan Search
3 results for "24c9a80df4c0bc075e8e1fa0a99b1de3"
>>40740064
>associated with
i wonder why they needed to he 'associated with'?
do you think theyre literally worshipping planets? stars in the sky? or perhaps, the more likely explanation, they merely were used to help people facilitate conceptual understanding of certain concepts. the jewish mind, especially the gnostics, seemed to have trouble with this, and drove themselves insane trying to wrap their minds around it. and we live in a world where the fallout of the consequences of that are felt every single day, everywhere. and if that failure didnt result in the plug being pulled, its likely humans arent the be-all-end-all that people like to imagine, and we are nothing but a stepping stone. no human has the architecture to read the akashic record, thats for sure. and christ, that guy didnt even come close.
>associated with
i wonder why they needed to he 'associated with'?
do you think theyre literally worshipping planets? stars in the sky? or perhaps, the more likely explanation, they merely were used to help people facilitate conceptual understanding of certain concepts. the jewish mind, especially the gnostics, seemed to have trouble with this, and drove themselves insane trying to wrap their minds around it. and we live in a world where the fallout of the consequences of that are felt every single day, everywhere. and if that failure didnt result in the plug being pulled, its likely humans arent the be-all-end-all that people like to imagine, and we are nothing but a stepping stone. no human has the architecture to read the akashic record, thats for sure. and christ, that guy didnt even come close.
>>40718418
Plato, and it isnt even a little bit close. but he was still off the mark, imperfect, but closer than anyone else. The best Holy books arent even Holy books, theyre accidental unconscious disclosures just in regular writing, usually fiction. but he was a man of 2500 years ago, you are a man 2500 years more evolved, you should be more capable than him in theory, at least in natural capabality. but theres been such a spiritual deprivity for so long and so wide scale that your spirit cant take full advantage, you are too acclimated and sensitive to your own environment. things were simpler then. you can learn from Plato how to approach the path, but very people can handle the mental trauma of actually undertaking it. the gnostics especially, drove themselves insane trying
do you know of the gnostic creation stories, with sophia, yaldabaoth, all his archons?
the gnostics were jews who tried to follow in pagans footsteps, the egyptians knew what they were doing, but got stuck somewhere, the greeks then followed the same formula, which you can see below. it is alot more prescriptive as to what its trying to conceptualize, which is the process of an imperfect creator's path towards perfection
you can see the different paths which are directed in the directions of what most would consider good and evil. each of these gods represents an emanation, and the perfection of that specific thing.
the gnostics broke themselves here, because they tried to incorporate this and tried to reconcile this path and structure of development with their own cultural beliefs, the social engineering system designed to elevate certain people into positions of power
if plato's republic was about making a state modeled after the perfect soul, then christianity was about making an imperfect soul, which lead to imperfect states, which could fall (to jews)
so christianity, and abrahamism especially is a sort of evil platonism. he could not foresee anyone so evil as to want to usurp god.
Plato, and it isnt even a little bit close. but he was still off the mark, imperfect, but closer than anyone else. The best Holy books arent even Holy books, theyre accidental unconscious disclosures just in regular writing, usually fiction. but he was a man of 2500 years ago, you are a man 2500 years more evolved, you should be more capable than him in theory, at least in natural capabality. but theres been such a spiritual deprivity for so long and so wide scale that your spirit cant take full advantage, you are too acclimated and sensitive to your own environment. things were simpler then. you can learn from Plato how to approach the path, but very people can handle the mental trauma of actually undertaking it. the gnostics especially, drove themselves insane trying
do you know of the gnostic creation stories, with sophia, yaldabaoth, all his archons?
the gnostics were jews who tried to follow in pagans footsteps, the egyptians knew what they were doing, but got stuck somewhere, the greeks then followed the same formula, which you can see below. it is alot more prescriptive as to what its trying to conceptualize, which is the process of an imperfect creator's path towards perfection
you can see the different paths which are directed in the directions of what most would consider good and evil. each of these gods represents an emanation, and the perfection of that specific thing.
the gnostics broke themselves here, because they tried to incorporate this and tried to reconcile this path and structure of development with their own cultural beliefs, the social engineering system designed to elevate certain people into positions of power
if plato's republic was about making a state modeled after the perfect soul, then christianity was about making an imperfect soul, which lead to imperfect states, which could fall (to jews)
so christianity, and abrahamism especially is a sort of evil platonism. he could not foresee anyone so evil as to want to usurp god.