>>725007009
>No, she should have done it because that is a common courtesy that is expected among video creators.
she should have played the fucking video games herself. picture trying to be a feminist scholar in video games but then refusing to touch a video game so you can record footage.
picture hating video games and the industry so much that you won't even dirty yourself with recording a few hours of footage of you dicking around in Mario 64, you have to go steal it from the 'ughh, GAMERS' to make your 150K dream happen.
because she did that, and instead of recognizing that this is obviously the behavior of a grifter who only got into it because she realized people like you were in it who would defend everything she does.
this is beyond the fact that taking this footage was definitely not fair use, no matter how you try to spin it.
>I fucking studied this shit
no you fucking didn't. lemme guess, you're a "copyright lawyer" too just because the other guy said he was? if you were, you would have realized that charging 'donations' for something doesn't mean it was free.
you literally just started saying "I STUDIED THIS I AM A STUDENT OF LAW" because the other anon said he was a copyright lawyer. what kind of dicklet cope are you on right now to feel this threatened about being bested in a thread about gamergate on 4chan?