>>76527533
At last that fraud is lowering his own volume recommendations.
Remember the "10-20 weekly sets" recommendation this literal dyel faggot fuck helped to propagate with the obvious implication that 10 weekly sets for each muscle being the "minimum"?
It's thanks to nerds like him that ppl have been overtraining for the last 10 years.
>>76527610
Retarded.
>>76527784
Some powerlifters do a ton of easy pussy sets with RPE 7 and below and the higher RPE sets are mostly like doubles or triples which are easier to recover from.
Not in any way comparable to bodybuilding "work sets".
>mark rippletits and stronglifts has done irreparable damage to the perception of powerlifting
SS already has people hardlining on recovery witth "just" 9 weekly work sets of quads, why do you think intermediate programs have lifters squat less than that?
It's already way too fucking much.
SL is an abomination, doing 5 sets of 5 squats 3x a week jflmao that's way harder than anything elite and even world class powerlifters do why do you think these programs stop working for advanced people exactly? They're way too hard for strong people.
>>76527836
This.
>>76527852
Efuckingxactly.
>>76527854
>20 sets of chest a week
>10 sets in a single session
>5 sets 4x a week
Just thinking a bit on this should make it obvious how retarded these high volume recommendations are.
No one should even try doing 20 sets of anything a week, it's retarded beyond comprehension.
>>76527876
>If I did just one big lift a day (i.e. squat) and I sunk 6 sets to or close to failure for it. Could I get away with just squatting once a week?
Yes.
You could get away with less sets if you increased frequency a bit too by doing 2 sets of squats and RDL 2x a week.
>>76527938
Don't make me post the reddit threads full of dyels doing 20 fucking sets a week.
